Suppr超能文献

饲喂状态下雏鸭和雏鸡能量与氮代谢的比较。

A comparison of the energy and nitrogen metabolism of fed ducklings and chickens.

作者信息

Siregar A P, Farrell D J

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 1980 May;21(3):213-27. doi: 10.1080/00071668008416659.

Abstract
  1. Energy measurements were made over 4 d on groups of three ducklings (aged from 5 to 22 d), and three broiler chickens (aged from 11 to 32 d) offered high- or low-energy diets. 2. Food, metabolisable energy (ME) and water intakes were significantly higher for ducklings than for chickens. The ratio of water:food was 4-2:1 and 2-3:1 for ducklings and chickens, respectively. The food conversion ratio differed between diets but not species. Performance was generally better for both species on the high-energy diet. 3. Heat production, energy, fat and protein retentions were higher for ducklings than chickens, and ducklings retained 0.44 of their energy as fat compared with 0.37 for chickens. Overall the ratio of protein (g) to fat (g) retention was 2.2:1 and 2.8:1 for ducklings and chickens respectively. 4. For ducklings, metabolisability of the high-energy diet declined from 0.774 to 0.747, and to a lesser extent of the low-energy diet, as they aged. There was no such decline for chickens. Net efficiency of utilisation of ME for gain was 0.64 for ducklings compared with 0.50 for chickens. 5. Fractional retention of dietary nitrogen (N) was 0.62 for ducklings and 0.55 for chickens. Gaseous ammonia-N was 4.5 and 2.2%, respectively, of N retained. 6. In a second experiment groups of ducklings only, were offered high- and low-protein diets from 12 to 22 d of age. Comparisons among four diets showed that food and energy intake was lower on the low-protein diet than on the other three. Energy retention on the high-energy diet was greater (P less than 0.05) than on the other three diets. 7. It was concluded that a high-energy diet is important for ducklings and chickens for maximum biological performance during the first 4 weeks of life.
摘要
  1. 对三组小鸭(5至22日龄)和三组肉鸡(11至32日龄)进行了为期4天的能量测量,分别给它们提供高能量或低能量日粮。2. 小鸭的采食量、可代谢能量(ME)和饮水量显著高于肉鸡。小鸭和肉鸡的水与食物的比例分别为4.2:1和2.3:1。日粮不同,食物转化率也不同,但物种间无差异。两种禽类在高能量日粮下的生长性能总体上更好。3. 小鸭的产热量、能量、脂肪和蛋白质保留量高于肉鸡,小鸭将其能量的0.44%以脂肪形式保留,而肉鸡为0.37%。总体而言,小鸭和肉鸡蛋白质(克)与脂肪(克)保留量的比例分别为2.2:1和2.8:1。4. 随着小鸭年龄增长,高能量日粮的可代谢性从0.774降至0.747,低能量日粮的可代谢性下降幅度较小。肉鸡则没有这种下降。小鸭利用ME增重的净效率为0.64,而肉鸡为0.50。5. 小鸭日粮氮(N)的部分保留率为0.62,肉鸡为0.55。气态氨-N分别占保留N的4.5%和2.2%。6. 在第二个实验中,仅对小鸭进行实验,从12至22日龄给它们提供高蛋白和低蛋白日粮。四种日粮之间的比较表明,低蛋白日粮的采食量和能量摄入量低于其他三种日粮。高能量日粮的能量保留量高于其他三种日粮(P小于0.05)。7. 得出的结论是,高能量日粮对小鸭和肉鸡在生命的前4周实现最大生物学性能很重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验