Glaser E M, Backer T E
Community Ment Health J. 1980 Summer;16(2):130-43. doi: 10.1007/BF00778585.
Why do some implementations in human service settings of goal attainment scaling (GAS), an innovative program evaluation technique, last over time, whereas others die out despite an initially successful period of operation? To provide some tentative answers to this question and to help shed more light generally on differences between sustained and nonsustained innovative programs in service delivery organizations, 10 intensive case studies were conducted. Four were goal attainment scaling programs that have proved durable over time in their host organizations versus six other programs in which goal attainment scaling did not survive despite some initial success. These case studies were analyzed both clinically and by means of expert judges' ratings to identify some of the critical variables that seem to be associated with durability of the goal attainment scaling programs.
目标达成量表法(GAS)是一种创新的项目评估技术,为何在人类服务环境中的一些应用能长期存在,而其他一些应用尽管在初期运营成功却逐渐消失?为了对这个问题给出一些初步答案,并更全面地了解服务提供组织中持续和非持续创新项目之间的差异,我们进行了10个深入的案例研究。其中4个是目标达成量表法项目,随着时间推移,它们在所在组织中证明是持久的;另外6个项目尽管初期取得了一些成功,但目标达成量表法未能持续下去。我们通过临床分析和专家评委评分对这些案例研究进行了分析,以确定一些似乎与目标达成量表法项目持久性相关的关键变量。