Brewster D C, O'Hara P J, Darling R C, Hallett J W
Circulation. 1980 Aug;62(2 Pt 2):I4-7.
Continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring has been generally accepted as the most sensitive detector of cerebral ischemia and need for an intraluminal shunt during carotid endarterectomy. More recently, internal carotid artery stump pressure has been proposed as a simpler and equally reliable indicator of possible inadequate cerebral perfusion. In this study, stump pressure measurements and EEG changes were compared in 80 carotid endarterectomies. The mean stump pressure for patients with ischemic EEG changes was 58 mm Hg, vs 66 mm Hg for those without EEG alterations (not statistically significant). Eleven of 17 patients with definite ischemic EEG changes had stump pressure greater than 59 mm Hg, a value generally equated with adequate cerebral perfusion. EEG interpretations and stump pressure predictions did not agree in 18 of 80 patients (22.5%). Stump pressure measurements should be used with caution as the sole monitor of cerebral ischemia and need for intraluminal shunting.
连续脑电图(EEG)监测已被普遍认为是颈动脉内膜切除术期间脑缺血和腔内分流需求的最敏感检测方法。最近,有人提出颈内动脉残端压力可作为脑灌注可能不足的一种更简单且同样可靠的指标。在本研究中,对80例颈动脉内膜切除术患者的残端压力测量值和脑电图变化进行了比较。脑电图出现缺血性改变的患者平均残端压力为58毫米汞柱,而脑电图无改变的患者为66毫米汞柱(无统计学意义)。17例脑电图出现明确缺血性改变的患者中有11例残端压力大于59毫米汞柱,该值通常被认为与脑灌注充足相等同。80例患者中有18例(22.5%)的脑电图解读结果与残端压力预测结果不一致。作为脑缺血和腔内分流需求的唯一监测指标,使用残端压力测量时应谨慎。