• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童膜翅目昆虫叮咬过敏反应的诊断与治疗

Diagnosis and treatment of anaphylactic reactions to Hymenoptera stings in children.

作者信息

Chipps B E, Valentine M D, Kagey-Sobotka A, Schuberth K C, Lichtenstein L M

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1980 Aug;97(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(80)80470-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(80)80470-7
PMID:7400882
Abstract

Forty-four children (mean age 9.6 years) with a history of an allergic reaction(s) to an insect sting and with positive insect venom skin tests were studied. IgE antibodies (RAST) to honeybee phospholipase A and to yellow jacket venom were found in the sera of 78% and 77%, respectively, of these patients. The patients were immunized with the appropriate venoms over a 15-week course and most were then subjected to an in-hospital sting; there was a 3% reaction rate (1/37). Clinical protection as associated with a fivefold increase in anti-venom IgG. Five patients did not develop a significant increase in IgG antibody and they were treated more vigorously; four were stung subsequently without reaction. Two patients did not react when stung in the field; positive identification of the culprit insect was obtained. Twenty patients were re-stung after one year of maintenance therapy; there was a single mild, delayed reaction. Immunotherapy also increased the IgE antibody against venom 3.7-fold at three months; after one year of therapy the IgE antibody level had decreased but was still 40% greater than at the outset. Immunotherapy was associated with a 25% incidence of local pain and swelling and a 6% incidence of systemic reactions. We conclude that venom therapy in children is safe and effective. The indications for initiating immunotherapy require further definition.

摘要

对44名有昆虫叮咬过敏反应史且昆虫毒液皮肤试验呈阳性的儿童(平均年龄9.6岁)进行了研究。在这些患者中,分别有78%和77%的血清中发现了针对蜜蜂磷脂酶A和黄蜂毒液的IgE抗体(放射变应原吸附试验)。患者在15周的疗程中接受了相应毒液的免疫治疗,之后大多数人在医院内接受了叮咬;反应率为3%(1/37)。临床保护与抗毒液IgG增加五倍相关。5名患者的IgG抗体没有显著增加,对他们进行了更积极的治疗;随后有4人被叮咬但无反应。2名患者在野外被叮咬时没有反应;已确定肇事昆虫。20名患者在维持治疗一年后再次被叮咬;有1例轻度延迟反应。免疫治疗在三个月时还使针对毒液的IgE抗体增加了3.7倍;治疗一年后,IgE抗体水平有所下降,但仍比开始时高40%。免疫治疗的局部疼痛和肿胀发生率为25%,全身反应发生率为6%。我们得出结论,儿童毒液治疗是安全有效的。启动免疫治疗的指征需要进一步明确。

相似文献

1
Diagnosis and treatment of anaphylactic reactions to Hymenoptera stings in children.儿童膜翅目昆虫叮咬过敏反应的诊断与治疗
J Pediatr. 1980 Aug;97(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(80)80470-7.
2
Age-dependent sting recurrence and outcome in immunotherapy-treated children with anaphylaxis to Hymenoptera venom.变应原免疫治疗的蜂类毒液过敏儿童随年龄增长的蜇伤复发率及结局。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Aug;43(8):950-5. doi: 10.1111/cea.12144.
3
Efficacy and safety of rush immunotherapy in patients with Hymenoptera allergy in Japan.日本膜翅目过敏患者快速免疫疗法的疗效与安全性。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2003 Jun;21(2):89-94.
4
Hymenoptera sting anaphylaxis and urticaria pigmentosa: clinical findings and results of venom immunotherapy in ten patients.膜翅目昆虫叮咬过敏反应和色素性荨麻疹:10例患者的临床发现及毒液免疫疗法的结果
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Jul;100(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70188-x.
5
Systemic reactions during maintenance immunotherapy with honey bee venom.蜂毒维持免疫治疗期间的全身反应。
Ann Allergy. 1988 Jul;61(1):63-8.
6
Natural history of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Eastern Spain.西班牙东部膜翅目毒液过敏的自然病史。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Feb;35(2):179-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02169.x.
7
Hymenoptera stings.膜翅目昆虫叮咬
Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2006 Nov;21(4):194-204. doi: 10.1053/j.ctsap.2006.10.002.
8
Rush hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is efficacious and safe.速发型膜翅目毒液免疫疗法有效且安全。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(4):232-8.
9
Hymenoptera venom allergy.膜翅目毒液过敏。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010 Feb;8(2):114-27; quiz 128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07125.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
10
Immunotherapy with Hymenoptera venoms. Position paper of the Working Group on Immunotherapy of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.膜翅目昆虫毒液免疫疗法。欧洲变态反应和临床免疫学会免疫疗法工作组立场文件。
Allergy. 1987 Aug;42(6):401-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1987.tb00355.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Venom immunotherapy protocols in the pediatric population: how to choose?儿科人群的毒液免疫疗法方案:如何选择?
Front Pediatr. 2023 Sep 7;11:1192081. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1192081. eCollection 2023.
2
[Sting challenge: indications and execution].[蜇刺激发试验:适应证与实施方法]
Hautarzt. 2014 Sep;65(9):796-801. doi: 10.1007/s00105-014-2779-2.
3
Clinical immunology review series: an approach to desensitization.临床免疫学综述系列:脱敏方法。
Clin Exp Immunol. 2011 Feb;163(2):131-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04296.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
4
[Diagnosis and treatment of insect venom allergy. An important allergic issue for the ear, nose and throat specialist].[昆虫毒液过敏的诊断与治疗。耳鼻喉科专家面临的一个重要过敏问题]
HNO. 2005 Dec;53(12):1099-115. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1331-1.
5
Venom immunotherapy for stinging insect allergy.蜂蜇昆虫过敏的毒液免疫疗法
Clin Rev Allergy. 1987 May;5(2):149-59. doi: 10.1007/BF02991204.