Weiss S T, Samet J M
J Med Educ. 1980 Aug;55(8):692-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198008000-00007.
A review was conducted of 585 articles in the medical literature, and the articles were categorized by study design and by statistical techniques employed. In the majority, statistics were utilized primarily for data description and hypothesis-testing. Descriptive studies were most frequent, and only a minority were epidemiological investigations. A questionnaire designed to assess knowledge of biostatistics and epidemiology relevant to this literature was administered to internists and medical house staff at a teaching hospital. Of 229 questionnaire recipients, 141 responded and achieved a mean score of 7.4 with 10.0 possible. Practicing physicians had a significantly lower mean score than house staff and full-time faculty. Scores were higher for the 44 percent of respondents who reported prior training in epidemiology or in biostatistics. The results of the journal review suggest that knowledge of basic biostatistics and of study design is important for reading medical literature. Physicians with prior training in epidemiology and in biostatistics appear to be better prepared for this task.
对医学文献中的585篇文章进行了综述,并根据研究设计和所采用的统计技术对文章进行了分类。大多数情况下,统计主要用于数据描述和假设检验。描述性研究最为常见,只有少数是流行病学调查。向一家教学医院的内科医生和住院医务人员发放了一份旨在评估与该文献相关的生物统计学和流行病学知识的问卷。在229名问卷受访者中,141人回复,平均得分为7.4分(满分10.0分)。执业医师的平均得分显著低于住院医务人员和全职教员。报告曾接受过流行病学或生物统计学培训的44%的受访者得分更高。期刊综述的结果表明,基本生物统计学知识和研究设计知识对于阅读医学文献很重要。接受过流行病学和生物统计学培训的医生似乎对此任务准备得更好。