Pieroni R E, Coplin T W, Leeper J D
J Fam Pract. 1980 Sep;11(3):403-6.
Sera obtained randomly from 37 patients seen at a family practice center were evaluated for protective antibodies against tetanus and diphtheria using in vivo toxin neutralization methods. The patients' ages ranged from 1 to 99 years. Seventy-four percent and 83 percent of patients were found to have protective antitoxin titers against tetanus and diphtheria, respectively. No significant differences in immune status were detected among different sexes or races. Whereas the mean age of subjects susceptible to tetanus was significantly greater than for those with protective antibody levels, this was not the case with diphtheria. It is postulated that natural diphtheria infection may be responsible for the high degree of protection noted among older subjects surveyed. Practical as well as educational benefits that may be obtained from a study of this nature are discussed.
从一家家庭医疗中心随机选取37名患者的血清,采用体内毒素中和法评估破伤风和白喉保护性抗体。患者年龄从1岁到99岁不等。分别有74%和83%的患者被发现具有针对破伤风和白喉的保护性抗毒素滴度。不同性别或种族之间未检测到免疫状态的显著差异。虽然易患破伤风的受试者平均年龄显著高于具有保护性抗体水平的受试者,但白喉情况并非如此。据推测,自然感染白喉可能是导致所调查老年受试者中高保护率的原因。讨论了从这类研究中可能获得的实际和教育方面的益处。