Ware M E
J Gen Psychol. 1980 Jul;103(1st Half):41-8. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1980.9711755.
Four experiments using stimuli which varied in size or texture investigated whether shifts in discrimination occurred when anchors and series stimuli were integral or nonintegral A total of 120 male and female college students judged series stimuli with respect to size. Anchors differed from the series stimuli in size or texture. The participants always observed the anchors visually. The E presented series stimuli either to the visual (intramodal) or haptic (crossmodal) sense. Analysis of variance revealed significant shifts in perceptual judgment for anchors presented both intra- and crossmodally but only when anchors and series stimuli dimensions were integral. Adaptation-level theory predicted significant shifts in judgment and properties associated with the dimensional structure of stimuli accounted for the limits of anchor effectiveness.
四项实验使用了大小或质地不同的刺激物,研究了当锚定刺激和系列刺激是整体的还是非整体的时候,辨别是否会发生变化。共有120名男女大学生对系列刺激物的大小进行了判断。锚定刺激在大小或质地上与系列刺激不同。参与者总是通过视觉观察锚定刺激。实验者将系列刺激呈现给视觉(同模态)或触觉(跨模态)感官。方差分析显示,无论是在同模态还是跨模态呈现锚定刺激时,知觉判断都有显著变化,但只有当锚定刺激和系列刺激的维度是整体的时候才会如此。适应水平理论预测了判断的显著变化,与刺激维度结构相关的属性解释了锚定有效性的局限性。