Orchik D J, Roddy N
J Speech Hear Disord. 1980 Aug;45(3):401-7. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4503.401.
The Synthetic Sentence Identification (SSI) and the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (NU6) were compared in a hearing aid evaluation procedure using normal-hearing listeners and subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Listener performance was assessed at three message-to-competition ratios (MCR) employing the same competing message. Aided benefit and residual deficit were evaluated for both measures and, in general, the results obtained with the NU6 indicated greater aided benefit as well as greater residual deficit than the SSI for these hearing-impaired subjects. The results are discussed in terms of the implications for clinical hearing aid evaluations.
在一项助听器评估程序中，对正常听力的听众和感音神经性听力损失患者使用了合成句子识别（SSI）和西北大学听力测试第6号（NU6）进行比较。采用相同的竞争信息，在三种信号-竞争比（MCR）下评估听众的表现。对这两种测试方法都评估了助听效果和残余听力损失，总体而言，对于这些听力受损的受试者，NU6测试结果表明其助听效果更好，但残余听力损失也比SSI测试结果更大。根据这些结果对临床助听器评估的意义进行了讨论。
