Krajewski J, Gromiec J, Dobecki M
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1980 Jul;41(7):531-4. doi: 10.1080/15298668091425211.
Three methods for desorption efficiencey determination were compared with a reference dynamic method for 12 compounds. Only one of them gave values that were statistically different. The method, in which standard solutions of determined compounds in CS2 are injected onto charcoal, is recommended to all laboratories dealing with air analysis as it is simpler than the dynamic method. Independence of the desorption efficiency on charcoal loading was also confirmed. The desorption efficiences for individual compounds and their mixtures were found to be different.
将三种解吸效率测定方法与一种参考动态方法针对12种化合物进行了比较。其中只有一种方法得到的值在统计学上存在差异。建议所有从事空气分析的实验室采用将二硫化碳中被测化合物的标准溶液注入活性炭的方法，因为该方法比动态方法更简单。还证实了解吸效率与活性炭负载量无关。发现单个化合物及其混合物的解吸效率有所不同。
