Suppr超能文献

包虫囊肿总是一个不重要的“次要发现”吗?(作者译)

[Is a hydatid cyst always an unimportant "secondary finding"? (author's transl)].

作者信息

Meinen K

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1980 Sep;40(9):798-803. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039334.

Abstract

527 small parovarial cysts, so-called hydatid cysts, were extirpated as "secondary findings" and examined histologically. 43 cysts (8,16%) were found with a definitely increased proliferation of the epithelium. In 12 cases (2,2%) so-called borderline tumors were detected, and a cystadenocarcinoma was identified in one. The results justify the demand to remove every small cystic or solid tumor in the range of the serous membrane of the small pelvis, and to let follow a routine histological examination.

摘要

527个小卵巢冠囊肿,即所谓的包虫囊肿,作为“次要发现”被摘除并进行组织学检查。43个囊肿(8.16%)被发现上皮细胞增殖明显增加。12例(2.2%)检测到所谓的交界性肿瘤,1例确诊为囊腺癌。这些结果证明了切除盆腔浆膜范围内的每一个小囊性或实性肿瘤并进行常规组织学检查的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验