Suppr超能文献

为行波概念辩护。

In defence of the travelling wave concept.

作者信息

Tonndorf J

出版信息

J Otolaryngol. 1980 Aug;9(4):316-28.

PMID:7420522
Abstract

For a period of about 15 years, L. Naftalin has raised objections against the travelling-wave concept of Békésy; these objections formed the point of departure for his own biochemical theory of cochlear stimulation. Others have, quite frequently, expressed similar objections; these can often be traced to some misconceptions concerning the travelling-wave phenomenon. This review will critically examine the pros and cons of the issue. The evidence presented is hoped to indicate that the travelling-wave concept is best able to account for the events underlying cochlear stimulation, as understood today, since it is well-supported, not only by Békésy's own evidence, but also by that supplied by many other authors since.

摘要

在大约15年的时间里,L. 纳夫塔林一直对贝凯西的行波概念提出异议;这些异议构成了他自己关于耳蜗刺激的生化理论的出发点。其他人也经常表达类似的异议;这些异议往往源于对行波现象的一些误解。本综述将批判性地审视该问题的利弊。希望所提供的证据能够表明,就目前的理解而言,行波概念最能解释耳蜗刺激背后的事件,因为它不仅得到了贝凯西自己的证据的有力支持,也得到了此后许多其他作者提供的证据的支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验