Suppr超能文献

为行波概念辩护。

In defence of the travelling wave concept.

作者信息

Tonndorf J

出版信息

J Otolaryngol. 1980 Aug;9(4):316-28.

PMID:7420522
Abstract

For a period of about 15 years, L. Naftalin has raised objections against the travelling-wave concept of Békésy; these objections formed the point of departure for his own biochemical theory of cochlear stimulation. Others have, quite frequently, expressed similar objections; these can often be traced to some misconceptions concerning the travelling-wave phenomenon. This review will critically examine the pros and cons of the issue. The evidence presented is hoped to indicate that the travelling-wave concept is best able to account for the events underlying cochlear stimulation, as understood today, since it is well-supported, not only by Békésy's own evidence, but also by that supplied by many other authors since.

摘要

在大约15年的时间里,L. 纳夫塔林一直对贝凯西的行波概念提出异议;这些异议构成了他自己关于耳蜗刺激的生化理论的出发点。其他人也经常表达类似的异议;这些异议往往源于对行波现象的一些误解。本综述将批判性地审视该问题的利弊。希望所提供的证据能够表明,就目前的理解而言,行波概念最能解释耳蜗刺激背后的事件,因为它不仅得到了贝凯西自己的证据的有力支持,也得到了此后许多其他作者提供的证据的支持。

相似文献

5
What basilar-membrane tuning says about cochlear micromechanics.基底膜调谐对耳蜗微力学的启示。
Am J Otolaryngol. 1982 Jan-Feb;3(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(82)80032-x.
7
Hearing: travelling wave or resonance?听觉:行波还是共振?
PLoS Biol. 2004 Oct;2(10):e337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020337. Epub 2004 Oct 12.
10
Energy transduction in the cochlea.耳蜗中的能量转换。
Hear Res. 1981 Nov;5(2-3):307-15. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(81)90054-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验