Schau H P, Fabricius E M, Schneeweiss U, Benedix A
Zentralbl Bakteriol A. 1980 Feb;246(1):80-97.
Careful delineation of a clostrial strain for human tumour diagnosis as against oncolytic tissue-active clostridial strains should be obligatory. We investigated the possibility to differentiate Clostridium butyricum CNRZ 528 (Bergère) against three different strains kept in our institute by means of biological, biochemical and by phage typing procedures. In addition, consistency in the control of half-technological spore production is required. It could be confirmed by this study that oncolytic properties of clostridial strains are biologically testable with adequate sensitivity in the hamster A Mel 3 tumour model. By means of typing procedures, we were able to clearly differentiate between Clostridium butyricum CNRZ 528 on one hand and Clostridium oncolyticum M 55 as well as Clostridium butyricum Jena H 8 on the other. The results of the tests are unsuitable for identifying Clostridium butyricum CNRZ 528 or Clostridium butyricum McClung 1672 A, respectively, nor can we distinguish Clostridium oncolyticum M 55 from Clostridium butyricum Jena H 8.
必须仔细区分用于人类肿瘤诊断的梭菌菌株与溶瘤组织活性梭菌菌株。我们通过生物学、生化和噬菌体分型程序,研究了区分丁酸梭菌CNRZ 528(贝热尔)与保存在我们研究所的三种不同菌株的可能性。此外,在控制半工业孢子生产方面需要保持一致性。本研究可以证实,梭菌菌株的溶瘤特性在仓鼠A Mel 3肿瘤模型中具有足够的敏感性,可以进行生物学检测。通过分型程序,我们能够清楚地区分一方面的丁酸梭菌CNRZ 528与另一方面的溶瘤梭菌M 55以及耶拿丁酸梭菌H 8。这些测试结果分别不适用于鉴定丁酸梭菌CNRZ 528或麦克伦丁酸梭菌1672 A,我们也无法区分溶瘤梭菌M 55和耶拿丁酸梭菌H 8。