Kenyon R V, Ciuffreda K J, Stark L
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980 Sep;57(9):566-77. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198009000-00007.
Accommodative vergence was measured using the Müller experimental paradigm in which target movement along the line of sight of the viewing eye results in large movement of the fellow (covered) eye. Our paper demonstrates an unexpected predominance of accommodative vergence over disparity vergence in patients with constant strabismus amblyopia, intermittent strabismus, and amblyopia without strabismus. Comparison of accommodative vergence responses in these patients with responses from normal subjects using symmetrical and asymmetrical targets under binocular and monocular conditions established the normal character of the patients' accommodative vergence and the absence of disparity vergence in most of them. The intermittent absence of disparity vergence in certain of our patients--some with surgically corrected strabismus, some with moderate amblyopia, and some with amblyopia treated with orthoptics--raises questions of clinical and neurophysiological interest. Preliminary results on the effects of amblyopia on accommodative responses are also presented.
采用米勒实验范式测量调节性聚散,在该范式中,目标沿着注视眼的视线移动会导致对侧(被遮盖)眼大幅移动。我们的论文表明,在恒定性斜视性弱视、间歇性斜视和无斜视性弱视患者中,调节性聚散意外地比视差性聚散占优势。在双眼和单眼条件下,使用对称和不对称目标,将这些患者的调节性聚散反应与正常受试者的反应进行比较,确定了患者调节性聚散的正常特征,且大多数患者不存在视差性聚散。我们的某些患者间歇性缺乏视差性聚散——一些患者斜视已通过手术矫正,一些患者有中度弱视,一些患者接受了视光学治疗——这引发了临床和神经生理学方面的问题。本文还给出了弱视对调节反应影响的初步结果。