Seedat Y K
Curr Med Res Opin. 1980;7(1):68-72. doi: 10.1185/03007998009116518.
A double-blind, crossover trial was carried out in 20 hypertensive patients (9 African and 11 Indian) to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of treatment with debrisoquin, mefruside, and a fixed-dose combination of the two drugs with placebo. Patients were treated initially with placebo for 2 weeks before being crossed-over to treatment for 4 weeks with each of the other regimens. Maximum daily dosages of the active drugs were 20 mg debrisoquin and 25 mg mefruside. Satisfactory hypotensive control, i.e. diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mmHg, was not achieved in any of the treatment periods. The best hypotensive response was obtained in African patients on mefruside. The combination of debrisoquin and mefruside did not produce the expected synergistic response. Few side-effects were reported. The failure of an adequate hypotensive response to debrisoquin in African and Indian patients could be due to a genetic difference in the hydroxylation of debrisoquin.
对20名高血压患者(9名非洲人、11名印度人)进行了一项双盲交叉试验,以比较地布立喹、美夫西特以及这两种药物的固定剂量组合与安慰剂治疗的有效性和耐受性。患者最初接受2周安慰剂治疗,然后交叉接受其他每种治疗方案4周的治疗。活性药物的最大日剂量为地布立喹20毫克和美夫西特25毫克。在任何治疗期间均未实现令人满意的血压控制,即舒张压小于或等于90毫米汞柱。在接受美夫西特治疗的非洲患者中获得了最佳降压反应。地布立喹和美夫西特的组合未产生预期的协同反应。报告的副作用很少。非洲和印度患者对地布立喹降压反应不足可能是由于地布立喹羟基化的遗传差异所致。