Suppr超能文献

[执业医师对降压嗪、甲基多巴和普萘洛尔降压疗效的评估]

[Evaluation by practicing physicians of the antihypertensive efficacy of debrisoquin, methyldopa and propranolol].

作者信息

Avigdor L, Waeber B, Brunner H R

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1983 Mar 5;113(9):331-8.

PMID:6342133
Abstract

The antihypertensive effect of debrisoquine (20 mg/day), methyldopa (100 mg/day) and propranolol (160 mg/day) was compared to that obtained with a placebo in a controlled trial carried out by a group of 14 internists. Forty-eight patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension were included. Mefruside (25 mg/day) was first given alone for 6 weeks ("open phase" of the trial) and to this diuretic was then added in double-blind fashion and randomized sequence a placebo or an active drug. Each of the 4 blind phases lasted 4 weeks. At the end of the "open phase", blood pressure in seated position averaged 168/111 +/- 19.6/13.5 mm Hg (mean +/- SD). A significant blood pressure decrease was observed after 4 weeks of treatment with the placebo as well as with the investigated compounds. With the placebo blood pressure was reduced to 158/102 +/- 19.6/13.5 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). The magnitude of the additional blood pressure decrease induced by the active drugs was relatively small and varied from 4 (debrisoquine) to 10 mm Hg (methyldopa, p less than 0.01) for the systolic and from 3 (debrisoquine, p less than 0.05) to 5 mm Hg (propranolol, p less than 0.05) for the diastolic. The percentage of patients with systolic pressure of less than or equal to 140 mm Hg and with diastolic pressure of less than 90 mm Hg during administration of either drug was not greater than 40 to 20% respectively. Propranolol appeared to be better tolerated than the other antihypertensive agents. These rather disappointing blood pressure results suggest that the efficacy of antihypertensive agents in private practice cannot be extrapolated from studies carried out in specialized hypertension clinics.

摘要

在一组14名内科医生进行的对照试验中,将地布喹(20毫克/天)、甲基多巴(100毫克/天)和普萘洛尔(160毫克/天)的降压效果与安慰剂的降压效果进行了比较。纳入了48例无并发症的原发性高血压患者。首先单独给予美夫西特(25毫克/天)6周(试验的“开放期”),然后以双盲方式并按随机顺序在该利尿剂中添加安慰剂或活性药物。4个盲法阶段各持续4周。在“开放期”结束时,坐位血压平均为168/111±19.6/13.5毫米汞柱(均值±标准差)。用安慰剂以及所研究的化合物治疗4周后,观察到血压显著下降。使用安慰剂时,血压降至158/102±19.6/13.5毫米汞柱(p<0.001)。活性药物引起的额外血压下降幅度相对较小,收缩压从4(地布喹)到10毫米汞柱(甲基多巴,p<0.01),舒张压从3(地布喹,p<0.05)到5毫米汞柱(普萘洛尔,p<0.05)。在使用任何一种药物期间,收缩压≤140毫米汞柱且舒张压<90毫米汞柱的患者百分比分别不超过40%至20%。普萘洛尔似乎比其他抗高血压药物耐受性更好。这些相当令人失望的血压结果表明,不能从在专门的高血压诊所进行的研究中推断抗高血压药物在私人诊所的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验