Dawson A K, Leon A S, Taylor H L
Am J Physiol. 1980 Sep;239(3):H427-31. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1980.239.3.H427.
Ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT), frequently determined in dogs during pentobarbital sodium anesthesia, usually is replaced by a single repetitive extrasystole threshold (SRET) or a multiple repetitive extrasystole threshold (MRET) determination in conscious animals and in the human being. In the present study SRET, MRET, and VFT were determined initially in 39 pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized dogs. One week later these three thresholds were redetermined during anesthesia in 13 of the 39 dogs (control group). In the remaining 26 dogs (experimental group), thresholds were redetermined while the dogs were conscious. Significant changes in threshold values occurred only in the experimental group for VFT (P < 0.001) and MRET (P < 0.02). The square of the linear correlation coefficient showed conscious state MRET to be a good predictor of conscious state VFT (R2 = 0.90). Conscious state SRET and anesthetized state VFT showed less predictiveness for the conscious VFT (R2 = 0.72 and 0.51, respectively). These data indicate that MRET may be preferable to SRET as an index of VFT. The SRET, MRET, and VFT determined during pentobarbital anesthesia may not accurately reflect the value of these parameters in the conscious animal.
心室颤动阈值(VFT)通常在戊巴比妥钠麻醉的犬类中测定,而在清醒动物和人类中,它通常被单次重复性期前收缩阈值(SRET)或多次重复性期前收缩阈值(MRET)测定所取代。在本研究中,最初在39只戊巴比妥钠麻醉的犬类中测定了SRET、MRET和VFT。一周后,在这39只犬中的13只(对照组)麻醉期间重新测定了这三个阈值。在其余26只犬(实验组)中,在犬清醒时重新测定了阈值。仅在实验组中,VFT(P < 0.001)和MRET(P < 0.02)的阈值发生了显著变化。线性相关系数的平方表明,清醒状态下的MRET是清醒状态下VFT的良好预测指标(R2 = 0.90)。清醒状态下的SRET和麻醉状态下的VFT对清醒状态下的VFT的预测性较低(分别为R2 = 0.72和0.51)。这些数据表明,作为VFT的指标,MRET可能比SRET更可取。在戊巴比妥麻醉期间测定的SRET、MRET和VFT可能无法准确反映清醒动物中这些参数的值。