Lechelt E C, Verenka A
Perception. 1980;9(5):581-9. doi: 10.1068/p090581.
Visual and haptic judgments of stimulus orientation were examined intramodally and crossmodally by having subjects reproduced standard stimulus orientations simultaneously with their inspection or after a delay. For all conditions, an oblique effect was obtained, i.e. vertical and horizontal orientations were reproduced reliably more accurately than oblique orientations. Although intramodal differences were large, with haptic errors being greater than visual errors, cross-model differences were small. Furthermore, while for intramodal conditions simultaneous visual reproductions were reliably more accurate than delayed reproductions but haptic reproductions were more accurate when delayed, cross-modal errors were reliable greater with simultaneous reproductions, regardless of whether the standard orientation was visual or haptic. The modality differences reflect basic differences in stimulus information processing and the stability of the oblique effect across the experimental conditions suggests that perceptual spatial anisotropic effects are strongly influenced by experiential factors.
通过让受试者在检查标准刺激方向的同时或延迟后再现标准刺激方向,对刺激方向的视觉和触觉判断进行了模态内和跨模态研究。在所有条件下,均获得了倾斜效应,即垂直和水平方向的再现比倾斜方向可靠且更准确。尽管模态内差异很大,触觉误差大于视觉误差,但跨模态差异很小。此外,对于模态内条件,视觉同步再现比延迟再现可靠且更准确,但触觉再现延迟时更准确;跨模态误差在同步再现时可靠地更大,无论标准方向是视觉的还是触觉的。模态差异反映了刺激信息处理的基本差异,并且倾斜效应在实验条件下的稳定性表明,感知空间各向异性效应受经验因素的强烈影响。