Schoysman R
Acta Eur Fertil. 1980 Mar;11(1):1-32.
After this brief summary of the indications for testicular biopsies, it is clear that we often use this technique willingly together with normal andrological examinations. We justify this operation above all not only because in a large number of cases we have been able to arrive at a therapeutical solution, but also for two other reasons. The first is that all andrological treatment, if it is to be of any use to the patient, will be so only after a very long period of time. If testicular insufficiency could be shown to exist by means of a quicker test method, then biopsies would be useless. But the investment of time, money and hope by patients undergoing andrological therapy is by definition so long that it is indispensible to know if therapeutical action is justified. And the second reason for which we defend testicular biopsy is our unshakable belief that the patient who consults a specialist for sterility must be given a formal diagnosis, even when he cannot be helped, so that he can take necessary decision regarding his life as soon as possible. The decision might be for adoption, or for artificial insemination by donor, when he knows quite definitely that his sterility is irreversible. These are very important decision, and are a complete justification for the use of such a simple procedure, which requires such little time, both on the part of the patient and of the doctor.
在对睾丸活检的适应症进行了简要总结之后,很明显,我们经常愿意将这项技术与常规的男科检查结合使用。我们认为这种手术合理,首先不仅是因为在大量病例中我们能够找到治疗方案,还因为另外两个原因。第一个原因是,所有男科治疗,要想对患者有用,都需要很长时间。如果能通过更快的检测方法证明存在睾丸功能不全,那么活检就没有必要了。但男科治疗患者投入的时间、金钱和希望从定义上来说都很长,因此了解治疗措施是否合理是必不可少的。我们支持睾丸活检的第二个原因是,我们坚信,因不育症咨询专科医生的患者必须得到明确的诊断,即使无法对其进行治疗,以便他能尽快就自己的生活做出必要的决定。当他确切知道自己的不育症无法逆转时,这个决定可能是收养,或者是接受供体人工授精。这些都是非常重要的决定,完全可以解释为何要采用这样一个简单的程序,因为这对患者和医生来说都只需要很少的时间。