Saxe A, Goldstein E, Dixon S, Ostrup R
Am Surg. 1980 Jul;46(7):391-7.
High-pressure pulsatile lavage is more effective than conventional irrigation in cleansing recently contaminated wounds. This method of irrigation was applied to postoperative infections in an attempt to lower wound bacterial counts to 10(5) or fewer organisms per gram of tissue, a level predictive of safe primary reclosure. Sequential wound biopsies for quantitative bacterial analysis demonstrated that high-pressure lavage is more effective than conventional irrigation in lowering bacterial counts in postoperative staphylococcal wound infections in guinea pigs. However, reductions were transient and did not lower counts sufficiently to permit safe reclosure. In contrast to results in newly contaminated wounds, pulsatile lavage of postoperative infections did not have therapeutic benefit. Reclosure of wounds with greater than 10(5) organisms per gram of tissue is unsafe even after five days of therapy.
在清洁近期污染的伤口方面,高压脉冲冲洗比传统冲洗更有效。这种冲洗方法被应用于术后感染,试图将伤口细菌计数降低至每克组织10⁵个或更少的微生物,这一水平预示着安全的一期缝合。用于定量细菌分析的连续伤口活检表明,在降低豚鼠术后葡萄球菌伤口感染的细菌计数方面,高压冲洗比传统冲洗更有效。然而,细菌数量的减少是短暂的,且不足以降低到允许安全缝合的程度。与新污染伤口的结果相反,术后感染的脉冲冲洗没有治疗益处。即使经过五天的治疗,每克组织中微生物数量大于10⁵个的伤口进行缝合也是不安全的。