Popp R L, Rubenson D S, Tucker C R, French J W
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Dec;93(6):844-56. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-844.
We review the basic similarities and differences of currently used M-mode and two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Discrete categories of disease are used to show the relative strengths of M-mode and 2D methods. The format of 2D echocardiography is well suited to analyze congenital heart disease, consequences of coronary artery disease, and distortions of anatomy due to acquired heart disease. Rapid structure movement is preserved with M-mode recording, facilitating detailed analysis of motion. The vast clinical experience with M-mode echocardiography can now be augmented by 2D echocardiography, but combination of 2D and M-mode methods is optimal for understanding each type of ultrasound recording and for best serving the patient.
我们回顾了当前使用的M型和二维(2D)超声心动图的基本异同。采用不同类别的疾病来展示M型和2D方法各自的相对优势。二维超声心动图的形式非常适合分析先天性心脏病、冠状动脉疾病的后果以及后天性心脏病导致的解剖结构变形。M型记录能够保留快速的结构运动,便于对运动进行详细分析。现在,二维超声心动图可以丰富大量关于M型超声心动图的临床经验,但将二维和M型方法结合起来,对于理解每种超声记录类型以及为患者提供最佳服务而言是最为理想的。