Sirois G, Eshaque M, Chabot M
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1980 Apr-Jun;1(4):167-77. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510010404.
Bioavailabilities of three quinidine formulations were compared. Two tablets of each dosage form were administered to 12 healthy volunteers according to a repeated Latin square design; plasma levels of unchanged and total drug were determined. Quinidine was absorbed significantly more rapidly from one of the formulations than the other two; the bioavailability of this formulation, calculated from intact drug data, normalized for subject differences, was also significantly greater than that of the other two, 68 and 76 per cent respectively. Individual comparisons of area under the curve (AUC) indicated that estimated relative bioavailability depends on the specificity of the assay, the adjustment of the AUC for the area beyond the last measurable plasma concentration and the normalization of the AUC. The data suggest there is a correlation between dissolution rate and peak plasma concentration.
比较了三种奎尼丁制剂的生物利用度。按照重复拉丁方设计,给12名健康志愿者服用每种剂型的两片药;测定了未变化药物和总药物的血浆水平。其中一种制剂中奎尼丁的吸收明显比其他两种制剂快;根据完整药物数据计算的该制剂生物利用度,经受试者差异校正后,也明显高于其他两种制剂,分别为68%和76%。曲线下面积(AUC)的个体比较表明,估计的相对生物利用度取决于测定方法的特异性、对最后可测血浆浓度以外区域的AUC调整以及AUC的标准化。数据表明溶出速率与血浆峰浓度之间存在相关性。