Simon H J, Studdert-Kennedy M
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Nov;64(5):1338-57. doi: 10.1121/1.382101.
A series of four experiments compared the effects of unequal probability anchoring and selective adaptation on phonetic and nonphonetic judgments. The basic stimulus series was a synthetic stop consonant continuum ranging from /b/ to /d/. On this continuum were superimposed covariations in fundamental frequency, intensity or vowel. In each experiment subjects listened to identical test tapes under two judgment conditions: place of articulation, and pitch or loudness or vowel judgments. The two types of judgment were significantly dissociated under both anchoring and adaptation paradigms, thus demonstrating that the former may be no less selective than the latter. From this and other evidence, it was concluded that the two paradigms are, in principle, equivalent, and that the main factors in speech adaptation effects are peripheral fatigue and central auditory contrast. If the selective processes of fatigue and contrast are taken to reflect functional channels of analysis rather than the operation of feature detectors, the same broad processes can be seen at work in both speech and nonspeech adaptation.
四项实验比较了不等概率锚定和选择性适应对语音和非语音判断的影响。基本刺激序列是一个从/b/到/d/的合成塞音连续体。在这个连续体上叠加了基频、强度或元音的协变。在每个实验中,受试者在两种判断条件下收听相同的测试磁带:发音部位,以及音高、响度或元音判断。在锚定和适应范式下,这两种判断类型都有显著分离,从而表明前者的选择性可能不低于后者。基于此及其他证据,得出的结论是,这两种范式原则上是等效的,并且语音适应效应的主要因素是外周疲劳和中枢听觉对比。如果将疲劳和对比的选择过程视为反映功能分析通道而非特征探测器的操作,那么在语音和非语音适应中都可以看到相同的广泛过程在起作用。