Tallal P, Stark R E
J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Feb;69(2):568-74. doi: 10.1121/1.385431.
The ability of 35 language impaired (LI) and 38 normally developing children between the ages of 5 and 8 1/2 yr to discriminate between speech stimuli, using an operantly conditioned, nonverbal motor response, was investigated. Six syllable contrasts ([ba] versus [da], [da] versus [ta], [epsilon] versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] versus [sta] and [sa] versus [integral a]) were selected to investigate discrimination of various temporal and spectral cues. Results demonstrated that the LI group made most errors discriminating syllables which were differentiated by consonants and fewest errors on those differentiated by vowels. The normal group made most errors discriminating between syllables including fricatives and brief vowels and fewest errors on stimuli differentiated by stop consonants or vowels in context. The LI group was significantly poorer than the normal in discriminating all syllables that incorporated brief temporal cues followed rapidly in succession by other acoustic cues. They also were impaired in discriminating [sa] versus [integral a]. They were unimpaired discriminating stimuli differentiated by vowels. It is suggested that the particular constraints demonstrated by LI children in their nonverbal and speech processing abilities may be attributed to abnormalities in mechanisms involved in auditory masking.
研究了35名语言障碍(LI)儿童和38名5至8.5岁正常发育儿童使用操作性条件反射的非语言运动反应来区分语音刺激的能力。选择了六组音节对比([ba]对[da]、[da]对[ta]、[ε]对[æ]、[dab]对[daeb]、[sa]对[sta]和[sa]对[ʃa])来研究对各种时间和频谱线索的辨别。结果表明,LI组在辨别由辅音区分的音节时错误最多,而在辨别由元音区分的音节时错误最少。正常组在辨别包含摩擦音和短元音的音节时错误最多,而在辨别由塞音或语境中的元音区分的刺激时错误最少。LI组在辨别所有包含短暂时间线索且随后迅速接连出现其他声学线索的音节时,明显比正常组差。他们在辨别[sa]对[ʃa]时也存在障碍。他们在辨别由元音区分的刺激时没有受损。有人认为,LI儿童在非语言和语音处理能力方面表现出的特定限制可能归因于听觉掩蔽相关机制的异常。