Department of English, East China Normal University, 200241, Shanghai, China.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Aug;51(4):903-916. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09869-5. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
How could individual differences in processing non-speech acoustic signals influence their cue weighting strategies for L2 speech contrasts? The present study investigated this question by testing forty L1 Chinese-L2 English listeners with two tasks: one for testing the listeners' sensitivity to pitch and temporal information of non-speech acoustic signals; the other for testing their cue weighting (VOT, F0) strategies for distinguishing voicing contrasts in English stop consonants. The results showed that the more sensitive the listeners were to temporal differences of non-speech acoustic signals, the more they relied on VOT to differentiate between the voicing contrasts in English stop consonants. No such association was found between listeners' differences in sensitivity to pitch changes of non-speech acoustic signals and their reliance on F0 to cue the voicing contrasts. The results could shed light on the different processing mechanisms for pitch and temporal information of acoustic signals.
个体在处理非言语声学信号方面的差异如何影响其对第二语言语音对比的线索加权策略?本研究通过测试 40 名以汉语为母语、以英语为第二语言的受试,使用两个任务来探讨这个问题:一个任务用于测试受试对非言语声学信号的音高和时域信息的敏感性;另一个任务用于测试他们在区分英语塞音的浊音对比时的线索加权(VOT、F0)策略。结果表明,受试对非言语声学信号时域差异的敏感性越高,他们就越依赖 VOT 来区分英语塞音的浊音对比。然而,在受试对非言语声学信号的音高变化的敏感性差异与他们对 F0 的依赖程度(用于提示浊音对比)之间,并未发现这种关联。研究结果为揭示声学信号的音高和时域信息的不同处理机制提供了线索。