Bouchet J Y, Franco A, Morzol B, Beani J C
J Mal Vasc. 1980;5(3):177-9.
Two methods are used to evaluate the walking distance: physiological walking along a standard path (0% - 6 mk/h) and walking on a tread mill (10% - 3 km/h). In both tests, four data are checked: -- initial trouble distance, -- cramp or walking-distance, -- localisation of pain, -- recovery time. These tests are dependable for the diagnosis of arterial claudication, reproducible and well tolerated. Their results have been compared: there is no correlation between the initial trouble distance and the cramp distance. However there is a correlation between the cramp distance by physiological walking and on treadmill. Recovery time, if long, is a criteria of gravity. Interests of both methods are discussed.
沿标准路径进行生理性步行（0% - 6千米/小时）以及在跑步机上步行（10% - 3千米/小时）。在这两项测试中，检查四项数据：——初始不适距离，——痉挛或步行距离，——疼痛部位，——恢复时间。这些测试对于诊断间歇性跛行是可靠的，具有可重复性且耐受性良好。对它们的结果进行了比较：初始不适距离与痉挛距离之间没有相关性。然而，生理性步行和在跑步机上步行时的痉挛距离之间存在相关性。恢复时间如果较长，则是病情严重程度的一个标准。对这两种方法的优势进行了讨论。
