• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健分配的伦理问题。

Ethics of the distribution of health care.

作者信息

Nichols A W

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1981 Mar;12(3):533-8.

PMID:7462953
Abstract

While the concept of a "right to health care" has been evolving in the United States, this should be distinguished from "the right to health," guaranteed in the constitutions of many socialist countries. In an effort to promote "quality of life" for their citizens, governments can, and do provide health care, but this does not always lead to health. In so doing, governments open access to care for those previously underserved--or unserved. For the United States at this time the goal becomes one of assuring equity, which will likely be achieved by locally based private and/or governmental entities, federated for greater efficiency and regulated by federal and state governments. Such programs will be staffed by a new breed of physician, the medical student of today.

摘要

在美国,“医疗保健权”的概念一直在演变,但这应与许多社会主义国家宪法所保障的“健康权”区分开来。为了提高公民的“生活质量”,政府能够且确实提供医疗保健,但这并不总能带来健康。这样做时,政府为那些以前未得到充分服务或未得到服务的人提供了获得医疗保健的机会。目前,美国的目标是确保公平,这可能由地方层面的私营和/或政府实体来实现,这些实体联合起来以提高效率,并由联邦和州政府进行监管。这类项目将由新一代医生,即如今的医学生来配备人员。

相似文献

1
Ethics of the distribution of health care.医疗保健分配的伦理问题。
J Fam Pract. 1981 Mar;12(3):533-8.
2
What's fair? Financing health services raises ethical questions.
Forum (Wash). 1981 Apr;5(1):16-21.
3
The allocation of limited medical resources: an ethical perspective.有限医疗资源的分配:伦理视角
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 1981 Spring;44(2):29-35.
4
Equity of access to medical care: a conceptual and empirical overview.医疗服务可及性的公平性:概念与实证综述。
Med Care. 1981 Dec;19(12 Suppl):4-27.
5
The scope and limits of equality as a normative guide to federal health care policy.平等作为联邦医疗保健政策规范性指南的范围与局限。
Public Policy. 1978 Fall;26(4):481-532.
6
Standards for adequate minimum personal health services.适当最低限度个人健康服务标准。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1979 Spring;57(2):212-33.
7
Justice in the allocation of public resources to disabled citizens.在向残疾公民分配公共资源方面的公平性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 May;69(5):333-6.
8
Equity of access to health care: some conceptual and ethical issues.医疗保健的公平可及性:一些概念和伦理问题。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1982 Winter;60(1):51-81.
9
Panel charges U.S. shirks duty to make "adequate' health care accessible to all.小组指控美国逃避让所有人都能获得“足够”医疗保健的责任。
Med World News. 1983 Apr 25;24(8):74-5.
10
A commentary on "Securing Access to Health Care." Ethics Commission access report urges adequate care for all.一篇关于《确保医疗保健可及性》的评论。伦理委员会的可及性报告敦促为所有人提供充分的医疗保健。
Hosp Prog. 1984 Jul-Aug;65(7):62-5.