Sommerfeld D, Fraser B A, Hensinger R N, Beresford C V
Phys Ther. 1981 Mar;61(3):338-44. doi: 10.1093/ptj/61.3.338.
The effects of two types of physical therapy service were studied over a five-month period in 19 severely mentally impaired cerebral palsied students aged 3 to 22 years. The students were paired and assigned to either a direct therapy treatment group or a supervised therapy management group. Ten similar students in a comparison group received no physical therapy. The study showed no significant difference in development of mature developmental reflexes, improvement of gross motor skills, or increase of passive joint motion among similar students placed in the direct, supervised, and comparison groups. This pilot study is not intended to decide the issue of physical therapy for these students. It does, however, indicate that objective tests may be used reliably to measure three major areas of sensory motor development. More extensive and longer-term studies are needed to determine the most beneficial form of physical therapy for this double-disability population.
在19名年龄在3至22岁之间、患有严重精神障碍的脑瘫学生中,对两种物理治疗服务的效果进行了为期五个月的研究。这些学生被配对并分配到直接治疗组或监督治疗管理组。对照组中的10名情况相似的学生未接受物理治疗。研究表明,在直接治疗组、监督治疗组和对照组中,相似的学生在成熟发育反射的发展、粗大运动技能的改善或被动关节活动度的增加方面没有显著差异。这项初步研究并非旨在决定这些学生的物理治疗问题。然而,它确实表明客观测试可以可靠地用于测量感觉运动发育的三个主要领域。需要更广泛和长期的研究来确定针对这种双重残疾人群最有益的物理治疗形式。