• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

杂交牛和瘤牛在天然牧场或罗得草牧场上放牧时的活重表现。

Liveweight performance of crossbred and Zebu cattle grazing on native or Rhodes grass pastures.

作者信息

O'Donovan P B, Woldegebriel A, Taylor M S, Gebrewolde A

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 1978 Nov;10(4):243-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02235353.

DOI:10.1007/BF02235353
PMID:746593
Abstract

Two experiments are described involving 33 crossbred (mainly Simmental and Jersey X Zebu) and 33 Zebu (Horro and Boran) bulls and steers. In experiment I, growth rates of crossbred and Zebu cattle rotationally grazed on either native pasture or Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) were compared during a 140 day grazing period at a stocking rate of 2.4 animals/ha. In experiment II, growth rate of cattle rotationally grazed for 140 days on native pasture was compared with that of a similar group grazed on Rhodes grass either rotationally or continuously at a stocking rate of seven animals/ha. On native pasture the average daily gain by Zebu animals was similar to that of the crossbreds whilst on Rhodes grass liveweight gain of Zebu animals was lower than that of the crossbreds. Daily gains of cattle were significantly (P less than 0.01) greater on continuous compared with rotationally grazed Rhodes grass.

摘要

描述了两项实验,涉及33头杂交牛(主要是西门塔尔牛以及泽西牛与瘤牛的杂交种)和33头瘤牛(霍罗牛和博拉纳牛)公牛及阉牛。在实验I中,比较了在天然牧场或罗得草(Chloris gayana)上轮牧的杂交牛和瘤牛的生长率,放牧期为140天,载畜率为2.4头/公顷。在实验II中,将在天然牧场上轮牧140天的牛的生长率与以7头/公顷的载畜率在罗得草上轮牧或连续放牧的类似牛群的生长率进行了比较。在天然牧场上,瘤牛的平均日增重与杂交牛相似,而在罗得草上,瘤牛的体重增加低于杂交牛。与在罗得草上轮牧相比,连续放牧的牛的日增重显著更高(P小于0.01)。

相似文献

1
Liveweight performance of crossbred and Zebu cattle grazing on native or Rhodes grass pastures.杂交牛和瘤牛在天然牧场或罗得草牧场上放牧时的活重表现。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1978 Nov;10(4):243-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02235353.
2
Intensive fattening of beef cattle on Rhodes grass pastures on the Lilongwe Plain, Malawi.在马拉维利隆圭平原的罗德草牧场上对肉牛进行集中育肥。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1977 May;9(2):99-106. doi: 10.1007/BF02236388.
3
Stocking rate and the productivity of Rhodes grass pastures on the Lilongwe Plain, Malawi.马拉维利隆圭平原的罗得西亚草牧场载畜率与生产力
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1978 Feb;10(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02235294.
4
Evaluation of hay-type and grazing-tolerant alfalfa cultivars in season-long or complementary rotational stocking systems for beef cows.在肉牛的全季或互补轮牧系统中对干草型和耐放牧苜蓿品种进行评估。
J Anim Sci. 2002 Mar;80(3):768-79. doi: 10.2527/2002.803768x.
5
Comparison of Marshall and Surrey ryegrass for continuous and rotational grazing.马歇尔黑麦草和萨里黑麦草用于连续放牧和轮牧的比较。
J Anim Sci. 1996 Sep;74(9):2269-75. doi: 10.2527/1996.7492269x.
6
Effect of nematode parasite infection on the performance of stocker cattle at high stocking rates on coastal bermudagrass pastures.线虫寄生虫感染对沿海百慕大草牧场高饲养密度下架子牛生产性能的影响。
Am J Vet Res. 1976 Apr;37(4):453-64.
7
Productivity and hay requirements of beef cattle in a Midwestern year-round grazing system.中西部全年放牧系统中肉牛的生产力和干草需求
J Anim Sci. 2004 Aug;82(8):2503-15. doi: 10.2527/2004.8282503x.
8
Responses of yearling steers to different stocking rates on a subtropical grass-legume pasture.
J Anim Sci. 1991 Aug;69(8):3348-56. doi: 10.2527/1991.6983348x.
9
Influence of grazing dormant native range or winter wheat pasture on subsequent finishing cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and ruminal metabolism.放牧休眠原生牧场或冬小麦牧场对后续育肥牛性能、胴体特征和瘤胃代谢的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Dec;81(12):3191-201. doi: 10.2527/2003.81123191x.
10
Feeding poultry litter to grazing Boran Zebu bulls and Ogaden sheep in Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚,给放牧的博拉安格斯牛和欧加登绵羊投喂家禽粪便。
Arch Tierernahr. 1985 Jul;35(7):507-14. doi: 10.1080/17450398509425211.

本文引用的文献

1
Intensive fattening of beef cattle on Rhodes grass pastures on the Lilongwe Plain, Malawi.在马拉维利隆圭平原的罗德草牧场上对肉牛进行集中育肥。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1977 May;9(2):99-106. doi: 10.1007/BF02236388.