Borutti G, Cosi V, Magrotti E, Cerutti G
Riv Neurol. 1980 May-Jun;50(3):193-211.
Simple reaction time with manual response (right and left hand) to visual stimuli lateralized was studied in 20 normal subjects at 5, 20 and 35 degree in the nasal and temporal hemifields of the right eye. The reaction time was studied as a function of stimulus eccentricity. Uncrossed and crossed reaction times were examined with particular attention. No prevalence was found, neither of one hand, or of one hemisphere. The global speed of the two hemiretinas was the same, but reaction time increased as a function of stimulus eccentricity; moreover a better performance was obtained stimulating the nasal hemiretina at 35 degrees. Uncrossed reactions, considered on the whole, were faster than crossed ones (7,4 msec); the delay between crossed and uncrossed responses remained constant regardless of the degree of the visual stimuli eccentricity. The AA. concluded that such a difference is mainly dependent upon anatomical structures. The AA. also discuss several and often conflicting literature data and conclude that either the attentional model of the orienting responses as proposed by Kinsbourne, or the stimulus-response conpatibility effects, can be taken into consideration to explain some conflicting results; these results have been obtained by methods in some way different from those performed with present report (choice reaction times, absulute randomisation of the stimuli, response by crossed hands, choice verbal responses).
在20名正常受试者中,研究了右手和左手对右眼鼻侧和颞侧半视野中5度、20度和35度视觉刺激的手动反应简单反应时间。反应时间作为刺激离心率的函数进行研究。特别关注了非交叉和交叉反应时间。未发现一只手或一个半球占优势的情况。两个半视网膜的整体速度相同,但反应时间随刺激离心率增加而增加;此外,在35度刺激鼻侧半视网膜时表现更好。总体而言,非交叉反应比交叉反应更快(7.4毫秒);无论视觉刺激离心率程度如何,交叉和非交叉反应之间的延迟保持恒定。作者得出结论,这种差异主要取决于解剖结构。作者还讨论了一些经常相互矛盾的文献数据,并得出结论,金斯伯恩提出的定向反应注意模型或刺激-反应相容性效应,都可以用来解释一些相互矛盾的结果;这些结果是通过与本报告不同的方法获得的(选择反应时间、刺激的绝对随机化、交叉手反应、选择言语反应)。