Moser K, Dorner F, Francesconi M, Ganzinger U, Graninger W, Lenzhofer R, Pesendorfer F X, Pohl A, Rainer H
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1980 Nov 21;92(22):789-96.
The present study gives an evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), macrophage electrophoretic mobility test (MEM), sialyltransferase, galactosyltransferase isoenzyme (SGT), ribonuclease and reverse transcriptase as diagnostic aids in malignant diseases. CEA and sialyltransferase are of certain value in the monitoring of cancer, as their values in the serum may rise before progression of disease or relapse. Both tests are not reliable parameters in the early diagnosis of malignancy. Our results with regard to the MEM test have not proved in any way useful in the diagnosis of cancer. Our preliminary results appear to indicate that, provided further simplification of the method can be achieved, SGT isoenzyme determination seems to be a better means of diagnosing cancer. In view of inherent-methodological difficulties reverse transcriptase has, at present, no clinical application in the diagnosis of cancer.
本研究对癌胚抗原(CEA)、巨噬细胞电泳迁移率试验(MEM)、唾液酸转移酶、半乳糖基转移酶同工酶(SGT)、核糖核酸酶和逆转录酶作为恶性疾病诊断辅助手段进行了评估。CEA和唾液酸转移酶在癌症监测中具有一定价值,因为它们在血清中的值可能在疾病进展或复发之前升高。这两项检测在恶性肿瘤的早期诊断中都不是可靠的参数。我们关于MEM试验的结果在任何方面都未证明对癌症诊断有用。我们的初步结果似乎表明,如果能进一步简化该方法,SGT同工酶测定似乎是诊断癌症的更好手段。鉴于逆转录酶存在固有的方法学困难,目前它在癌症诊断中没有临床应用。