Suppr超能文献

进餐频率和蛋白质浓度对肥胖受试者体重减轻构成的影响。

The effect of meal frequency and protein concentration on the composition of the weight lost by obese subjects.

作者信息

Garrow J S, Durrant M, Blaza S, Wilkins D, Royston P, Sunkin S

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 1981 Jan;45(1):5-15. doi: 10.1079/bjn19810072.

Abstract
  1. Nitrogen balance, weight loss and resting metabolic rate were measured in thirty-eight obese inpatients on 3.4 MJ (800 kcal)/d diets over 3 weeks. 2. All subjects were fed on 13% protein-energy in three meals/d for the first week. 3. In weeks 2 or 3, using a cross-over design, ten subjects were fed on 15 or 10% protein-energy as three meals/d; fourteen subjects were fed on five or one meal/d with 13% protein-energy; and fourteen subjects were fed on 15% protein-energy as five meals/d or 10% protein-energy as one meal/d. 4. N loss was least on the high-protein week and frequent-meal week: the largest difference was found when these effects were combined (P less than 0.001). 5. When protein-energy was held constant at 13% N loss decreased significantly (P less than 0.01) between week 2 and 3, but when the protein-energy was manipulated there was no significant N conservation in the third week. This suggests that the protein:energy value is more important than meal frequency in the preservation of lean tissue. 6. Weight loss was also least on the 'high-protein' week and 'frequent-meal' week, but this result reached significance only when the effects were combined (P less than 0.05). 7. Resting metabolic rate decreased with time but was not significantly altered by the dietary regimens. 8. Therefore, during the first 3 weeks at an intake of 3.4 MJ/d, a diet with a high-protein concentration, fed as frequent small meals, is associated with better preservation of lean tissue than an isoenergetic diet with lower-protein concentration fed as fewer meals. There was no evidence that meal frequency or protein concentration affect the rate of fat loss.
摘要
  1. 对38名肥胖住院患者进行了为期3周的研究,测量他们在每日摄入3.4兆焦耳(800千卡)饮食情况下的氮平衡、体重减轻和静息代谢率。2. 第一周,所有受试者三餐的蛋白质能量占比为13%。3. 在第2周或第3周,采用交叉设计,10名受试者三餐的蛋白质能量占比为15%或10%;14名受试者每日进食5餐或1餐,蛋白质能量占比为13%;14名受试者每日进食5餐的蛋白质能量占比为15%或每日进食1餐的蛋白质能量占比为10%。4. 在高蛋白周和多餐周,氮损失最少:当这两种效应结合时差异最大(P小于0.001)。5. 当蛋白质能量保持在13%时,第2周和第3周之间氮损失显著降低(P小于0.01),但当调整蛋白质能量时,第3周没有明显的氮保留。这表明在保留瘦组织方面,蛋白质:能量值比进餐频率更重要。6. 在“高蛋白”周和“多餐”周体重减轻也最少,但只有当两种效应结合时该结果才具有统计学意义(P小于0.05)。7. 静息代谢率随时间下降,但饮食方案对其无显著影响。8. 因此,在每日摄入3.4兆焦耳的前3周内,与低蛋白浓度、少食多餐的等能量饮食相比,高蛋白浓度、少食多餐的饮食与更好地保留瘦组织有关。没有证据表明进餐频率或蛋白质浓度会影响脂肪损失率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验