Lehman R A
Cortex. 1980 Aug;16(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(80)80055-4.
The results of this study of the hand preferences of rhesus monkeys on three different tasks are threefold: (1) When retested on the same task at intervals exceeding one month virtually all individuals prefer the same hand as they did during the original test, (2) When retested on the same task, the strength of hand preference displayed by each individual is increased. (3) When tested on differing tasks, monkeys display little consistency in the laterality of hand preference or the strength of handedness expressed during different tasks. Many authors have concluded that the lack of obvious intertask consistency in the laterality of hand preference expressed by lower primates constitutes evidence for a corresponding lack of consistent laterality in the cerebral control of this behavior. This has led to them to conclude that cerebral dominance probably does not exist in these animals (Deuel, 1975; Warren, 1977). However, where data is available from the literature, including the present study, all reports show monkeys to more frequently prefer the same hand on all of the unimanual tasks they were given than would be expected by chance alone. This finding suggests that there is a weak tendency for consistent lateralization of hand usage in the monkey. Presumably, there is a corresponding predominance of the cerebral hemisphere contralateral to the preferred hand over its mate. Other studies consistent with the concept of cerebral predominance in the monkey were reviewed. These findings do not constitute evidence for cerebral dominance in the monkey akin to that found in man. They do suggest that when performing certain activities, monkeys may have one hemisphere predominant over the other even though the degree and laterality of predominance may vary greatly from one individual and task to another.
(1)当在间隔超过一个月的时间里对同一任务进行重新测试时,几乎所有个体都偏好与最初测试时相同的手;(2)当对同一任务进行重新测试时,每个个体表现出的用手偏好强度会增加;(3)当在不同任务上进行测试时,猴子在用手偏好的偏侧性或不同任务中表现出的利手强度方面几乎没有一致性。许多作者得出结论,低等灵长类动物在用手偏好的偏侧性方面缺乏明显的任务间一致性,这证明在这种行为的大脑控制中相应地缺乏一致的偏侧性。这导致他们得出结论,这些动物可能不存在大脑优势(迪尤尔,1975年;沃伦,1977年)。然而,从包括本研究在内的文献中可获得的数据来看,所有报告都表明,猴子在所有给定的单手任务中更频繁地偏好同一只手,其频率高于仅由随机因素预期的频率。这一发现表明,猴子在用手使用上存在一致偏侧化的微弱趋势。据推测,与偏好手对侧的大脑半球相对于其配对半球占优势。还综述了其他与猴子大脑优势概念相符的研究。这些发现并不构成猴子像人类那样存在大脑优势的证据。它们确实表明,猴子在执行某些活动时,可能有一个半球比另一个半球占优势,尽管优势的程度和偏侧性在不同个体和任务之间可能有很大差异。