Macrae J H
National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, Australia.
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Aug;38(4):949-59. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3804.949.
Excessive amplification by hearing aids causes temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS). This investigation addressed the question whether it might be possible to predict the eventual amount of PTS caused by excessive amplification from the amount of TTS it causes after a day of hearing aid use. Asymptotic TTS (ATS) to be expected as a result of hearing aid use was predicted for 8 children with sensorineural hearing loss and the predicted ATS was compared with observed permanent deterioration of their thresholds attributed to hearing aid use. There was good agreement between the predicted ATS and observed PTS at 500 to 2000 Hz. It follows that, for prediction of PTS caused by hearing aid use, the mean of the sound levels produced in the ear by the hearing aid is the correct equivalent continuous level (ECL) to use and that the Modified Power Law (MPL) is the appropriate method of adjusting the predictions for sensorineural hearing loss, because these have been shown to be appropriate for prediction of TTS caused by hearing aid use. Predictions of the PTS to be expected for the children that were carried out using the MPL and the mean level as the ECL were in good agreement with the observed PTS at 500 to 2000 Hz, whereas predictions of PTS based on an alternative method of correction for sensorineural hearing loss (the Continuation Hypothesis) were significantly less than the observed amounts. The results of the PTS predictions therefore confirmed the conclusions drawn from the results of the ATS predictions.
助听器的过度放大可导致暂时性阈移(TTS)和永久性阈移(PTS)。本研究探讨了是否有可能根据使用助听器一天后所引起的TTS量来预测过度放大所导致的最终PTS量。对8名感音神经性听力损失儿童使用助听器后预期的渐近性TTS(ATS)进行了预测,并将预测的ATS与观察到的因使用助听器导致的阈值永久性恶化进行了比较。在500至2000Hz频率范围内,预测的ATS与观察到的PTS之间具有良好的一致性。由此可见,为预测使用助听器引起的PTS,助听器在耳内产生的声级平均值是正确的等效连续声级(ECL),且修正功率定律(MPL)是针对感音神经性听力损失调整预测的合适方法,因为这些已被证明适用于预测使用助听器引起的TTS。使用MPL并将平均声级作为ECL对儿童预期的PTS进行预测,在500至2000Hz频率范围内与观察到的PTS高度一致,而基于感音神经性听力损失的另一种校正方法(连续假设)对PTS的预测则显著低于观察到的量。因此,PTS预测结果证实了从ATS预测结果得出的结论。