• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

所有权、运营环境及战略选择对养老院效率的影响。

The effects of ownership, operating environment, and strategic choices on nursing home efficiency.

作者信息

Rosko M D, Chilingerian J A, Zinn J S, Aaronson W E

机构信息

Department of Health and Medical Services Administration, Widener University, Chester, PA 19013-5792, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1995 Oct;33(10):1001-21. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199510000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-199510000-00003
PMID:7475400
Abstract

This article reports on a study of the labor efficiency of 461 nursing homes located in Pennsylvania. Data envelopment analysis was used to estimate efficiency scores. Tobit equations were estimated for the entire sample and for subsamples consisting of for-profit (FP) and not-for-profit (NFP) nursing homes. The authors found that the major factors explaining efficiency were managerial and environmental characteristics such as ownership, occupancy rate, size, payment source, wage rate, and per capita income, rather than quality characteristics of nursing homes. Analysis of the FP and NFP subsamples suggests that many NFP homes may respond to environmental pressures by increasing their efficiency, whereas FP homes tend to operate at a high level of efficiency irrespective of environmental and regulatory pressures.

摘要

本文报道了一项对宾夕法尼亚州461家养老院劳动效率的研究。数据包络分析用于估计效率得分。对整个样本以及由营利性(FP)和非营利性(NFP)养老院组成的子样本估计了托比特方程。作者发现,解释效率的主要因素是管理和环境特征,如所有权、入住率、规模、支付来源、工资率和人均收入,而非养老院的质量特征。对FP和NFP子样本的分析表明,许多NFP养老院可能通过提高效率来应对环境压力,而FP养老院无论环境和监管压力如何,往往都能保持较高的运营效率。

相似文献

1
The effects of ownership, operating environment, and strategic choices on nursing home efficiency.所有权、运营环境及战略选择对养老院效率的影响。
Med Care. 1995 Oct;33(10):1001-21. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199510000-00003.
2
The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.所有权及所有权变更对疗养院行业成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):327-46.
3
Do for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes behave differently?营利性和非营利性养老院的行为有差异吗?
Gerontologist. 1994 Dec;34(6):775-86. doi: 10.1093/geront/34.6.775.
4
Quality of care in nursing homes: an analysis of relationships among profit, quality, and ownership.养老院的护理质量:对利润、质量和所有权之间关系的分析。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1318-30. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100586.33970.58.
5
Managerial Ownership in Nursing Homes: Staffing, Quality, and Financial Performance.养老院的管理层所有权:人员配备、质量和财务绩效。
Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1136-1146. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx104.
6
Do public nursing home care providers deliver higher quality than private providers? Evidence from Sweden.公立养老院护理服务提供者的服务质量是否高于私立提供者?来自瑞典的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2403-0.
7
Technical, scale, and size efficiency in nursing home care: a nonparametric analysis of Connecticut homes.养老院护理中的技术、规模和规模效率:对康涅狄格州养老院的非参数分析
Health Econ. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):363-73. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<363::AID-HEC217>3.0.CO;2-1.
8
Regulation, ownership and efficiency in the Swiss nursing home industry.瑞士养老院行业的监管、所有权与效率
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2002 Jun;2(2):79-97. doi: 10.1023/a:1019975330960.
9
Nursing home ownership revisited: market, cost and quality relationships.重新审视养老院所有权:市场、成本与质量的关系
Med Care. 1993 Nov;31(11):1062-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00008.
10
Competitive spillovers across non-profit and for-profit nursing homes.非营利性和营利性养老院之间的竞争溢出效应。
J Health Econ. 2003 Jan;22(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00093-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicare skilled nursing facilities' occupancy and payer source: The moderating role of financial performance.医疗保险熟练护理设施的入住率和付款方来源:财务绩效的调节作用。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Aug 30;12:20503121241275368. doi: 10.1177/20503121241275368. eCollection 2024.
2
Technical Efficiency of Public and Private Hospitals in Beijing, China: A Comparative Study.中国北京公立医院与私立医院的技术效率:比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1):82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010082.
3
A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes.
养老院效率测量的系统文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 20;16(12):2186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122186.
4
Study of the Relevance of the Quality of Care, Operating Efficiency and Inefficient Quality Competition of Senior Care Facilities.老年护理机构护理质量、运营效率与低效质量竞争的相关性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 11;14(9):1047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091047.
5
Technical efficiency of selected hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东部部分医院的技术效率
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Dec;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0161-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Technical efficiency of nursing homes: do five-star quality ratings matter?养老院的技术效率:五星级质量评级重要吗?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Sep;21(3):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9392-8. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Technical and scale efficiency in public and private Irish nursing homes - a bootstrap DEA approach.公有和私有爱尔兰养老院的技术和规模效率——一种 bootstrap DEA 方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Sep;21(3):326-347. doi: 10.1007/s10729-016-9389-8. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
How efficient are referral hospitals in Uganda? A data envelopment analysis and tobit regression approach.乌干达的转诊医院效率如何?数据包络分析和托比特回归方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 8;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1472-9.
9
Cost efficiency of nursing homes: do five-star quality ratings matter?养老院的成本效益:五星级质量评级重要吗?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2017 Sep;20(3):316-325. doi: 10.1007/s10729-016-9355-5. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
Does integration of HIV and sexual and reproductive health services improve technical efficiency in Kenya and Swaziland? An application of a two-stage semi parametric approach incorporating quality measures.整合艾滋病毒与性健康和生殖健康服务能否提高肯尼亚和斯威士兰的技术效率?一种纳入质量指标的两阶段半参数方法的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;151:147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 11.