• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1985 - 1992年私人医疗保险保费增长率分析

Analysis of private health insurance premium growth rates: 1985-1992.

作者信息

Feldstein P J, Wickizer T M

机构信息

Graduate School of Management, University of California at Irvine 92717, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1995 Oct;33(10):1035-50. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199510000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-199510000-00005
PMID:7475402
Abstract

The rate of increase in health care expenditures has been a central policy concern for well over a decade, yet little empirical research has been conducted to examine expenditure growth rates. This study analyzed health insurance premium growth rates for a selected sample of 95 insured groups over the period 1985 to 1992. During this time, premiums increased by approximately 150% in nominal terms and by 45% in real terms. The observed rate of growth was not constant over time, however. The most rapid growth occurred during the years 1986 to 1989; thereafter, the rate of increase in premiums declined. Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the effects on premium growth rates of selected variables representing insurance benefit design features, market competitive factors, insurance system factors, and group-specific factors. In addition to the percentage increase in benefit payments, other factors found to affect premium growth rates were health maintenance organization market penetration, deductible level, the coinsurance rate, and state insurance mandates. Further, this analysis suggests that the insurance underwriting cycle may play an important role in influencing insurance premium growth rates. These results support the belief that health maintenance organization induced competition has potential to control the rate of increase in health care costs.

摘要

十多年来,医疗保健支出的增长速度一直是核心政策关注点,但很少有实证研究来考察支出增长率。本研究分析了1985年至1992年期间95个参保群体的选定样本的健康保险保费增长率。在此期间,保费名义上增长了约150%,实际增长了45%。然而,观察到的增长率并非随时间恒定不变。增长最快的时期是1986年至1989年;此后,保费增长率下降。进行了多变量分析,以评估代表保险福利设计特征、市场竞争因素、保险制度因素和特定群体因素的选定变量对保费增长率的影响。除了福利支付的百分比增长外,发现影响保费增长率的其他因素包括健康维护组织的市场渗透率、免赔额水平、共保率和州保险授权。此外,该分析表明保险承保周期可能在影响保险费增长率方面发挥重要作用。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即健康维护组织引发的竞争有可能控制医疗保健成本的增长速度。

相似文献

1
Analysis of private health insurance premium growth rates: 1985-1992.1985 - 1992年私人医疗保险保费增长率分析
Med Care. 1995 Oct;33(10):1035-50. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199510000-00005.
2
Corporate benefit policies and health insurance costs.公司福利政策与健康保险成本。
J Health Econ. 1984 Dec;3(3):275-96. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(84)90015-8.
3
The impact of HMO competition on private health insurance premiums, 1985-1992.
Inquiry. 1995 Fall;32(3):241-51.
4
Trends in the golden state: small-group premiums rise sharply while actuarial values for individual coverage plummet.金州的趋势:小团体保险费大幅上涨,而个人保险的精算价值却大幅下降。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):w488-99. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.w488. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
5
Employers tell health plans 'not so fast' on premium hikes.
Manag Care. 1998 Jul;7(7):26, 29.
6
Who really pays for health insurance? The incidence of employer-provided health insurance with sticky nominal wages.究竟谁为医疗保险买单?名义工资粘性下雇主提供的医疗保险的归宿。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005 Mar;5(1):89-118. doi: 10.1007/s10754-005-6603-5.
7
Employer contribution and premium growth in health insurance.雇主在健康保险方面的缴费及保费增长。
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
9
Employer's HMO premiums rise as high as 50%.
Circulation. 2001 Aug 14;104(7):E9011-3.
10
Employer contribution methods and health insurance premiums: does managed competition work?雇主缴费方式与健康保险费:管理式竞争有效吗?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Jun;1(2):159-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1012878628161.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of area HMO market share on cancer screening.健康维护组织(HMO)在区域市场的份额对癌症筛查的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1751-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00316.x.
2
Managed care and employer premiums.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Jun;3(2):95-116. doi: 10.1023/a:1023317214453.
3
Studying the effects of health plan competition: are available data resources up to the task?研究健康计划竞争的影响:现有数据资源能否胜任这项任务?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Apr;36(1 Pt 2):253-75.
4
Competition in hospital and health insurance markets: a review and research agenda.医院与健康保险市场中的竞争:综述与研究议程
Health Serv Res. 2001 Apr;36(1 Pt 2):191-221.
5
Uninsured status and out-of-pocket costs at midlife.中年时的未参保状态与自付费用
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):911-32.
6
The effect of selective contracting on hospital costs and revenues.选择性签约对医院成本和收入的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Oct;35(4):849-67.