Jordan K G
Neurodiagnostic Laboratory, St. Bernardine Medical Center, California, USA.
Neurol Clin. 1995 Aug;13(3):579-626.
Neurologically critically ill patients, more often than others, are unable to communicate and, for a crucial period of time, have the vital functions of their brains hidden in the "black box" of the cranial vault behind a curtain of ambiguity and immobility. Customarily--and naively--we have relied upon beside clinical observations to pierce these barriers. Recent insights lead us to conclude that these "neurochecks" no longer suffice. This article has surveyed four major monitoring systems relied upon by neurointensivists to evaluate the pathophysiology of their patients. Of these, ICPM has the longest clinical track record. It provides a quantitative measure of the brain's capacity to withstand ICP and helps us monitor interventions to reduce it. To utilize this information intelligently requires an understanding of the principles of ICC, CPP, ICP wave morphology, and the hardware available. NICU-CEEG is a more recent introduction but, in principle, it transfers from the laboratory and operating suite to the ICU bedside, established correlations among electrophysiology, CBF, and CM. Digital EEG has allowed us to overcome significant logistical barriers and made NICU-CEEG a practical ICU tool. Early but impressive data suggest that NICU-CEEG has a significant clinical impact in patients with ACI, uncontrolled seizures, or coma. It also has revealed that NICU patients have a surprisingly high incidence of NCS, which may adversely affect their outcome. TCD has contributed greatly to diagnosis and management of SAH vasospasm. It also can be applied with benefit to patients with increased ICP, and has promising value in patients with ACI. It may prove beneficial in monitoring unstable cerebral embolization. Several bedside methods for monitoring CBF are available, but they require refinement to become true monitoring systems. These methods have revealed clinically important insights in patients with head trauma, SAH vasospasm, and ACI. Methods for directly monitoring CM and CMRo2 are improving our understanding of the brain's responses to injury, and becoming increasingly relevant to bedside management. SjvO2 can detect cerebral ischemia caused by overzealous hyperventilation and accelerated ICP. ICO holds promise as a noninvasive transcranial method for assessing Scvo2. We soon may see a scalp array of such detectors, similar to an EEG "montage," that allows us to assess multiregional Scvo2. To be useful, a clinical method should raise questions for further investigation. If the neurophysiologic monitoring systems described here provide us with some answers and lead us to ask useful new questions, they will prove their benefit to our patients.
与其他患者相比,神经系统危重症患者往往无法进行交流,并且在关键的一段时间内,他们大脑的重要功能隐藏在颅腔的“黑匣子”中,被一层模糊性和静止性所掩盖。习惯上——并且很天真地——我们一直依靠床边临床观察来突破这些障碍。最近的见解使我们得出结论,这些“神经检查”已不再足够。本文调查了神经重症监护医生用于评估患者病理生理学的四种主要监测系统。其中,颅内压监测(ICPM)的临床记录最长。它提供了大脑承受颅内压能力的定量测量,并帮助我们监测降低颅内压的干预措施。要明智地利用这些信息,需要了解颅内顺应性(ICC)、脑灌注压(CPP)、颅内压波形形态以及可用硬件的原理。新生儿重症监护病房脑电图监测(NICU - CEEG)是较新引入的技术,但原则上,它从实验室和手术室转移到了重症监护病房床边,建立了电生理学、脑血流量(CBF)和脑代谢(CM)之间的相关性。数字脑电图使我们能够克服重大的后勤障碍,并使NICU - CEEG成为一种实用的重症监护病房工具。早期但令人印象深刻的数据表明,NICU - CEEG对急性脑梗死(ACI)、癫痫控制不佳或昏迷患者具有重大临床影响。它还揭示了重症监护病房患者神经传导异常(NCS)的发生率惊人地高,这可能对他们的预后产生不利影响。经颅多普勒超声(TCD)对蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)血管痉挛的诊断和管理有很大贡献。它也可有益地应用于颅内压升高的患者,并且在ACI患者中具有潜在价值。它可能在监测不稳定的脑栓塞方面证明是有益的。有几种床边监测脑血流量的方法,但它们需要改进才能成为真正的监测系统。这些方法在头部创伤、SAH血管痉挛和ACI患者中揭示了临床上重要的见解。直接监测脑代谢和脑氧代谢率(CMRo2)的方法正在增进我们对大脑对损伤反应的理解,并且与床边管理的相关性越来越大。颈静脉血氧饱和度(SjvO2)可以检测因过度换气和颅内压升高导致的脑缺血。近红外光谱技术(ICO)有望成为一种评估颈内静脉血氧饱和度(Scvo2)的无创经颅方法。我们很快可能会看到一系列这样的头皮探测器,类似于脑电图“导联组合”,使我们能够评估多区域的Scvo2。要有用,一种临床方法应该提出进一步研究的问题。如果这里描述的神经生理监测系统为我们提供了一些答案,并引导我们提出有用的新问题,它们将证明对我们的患者有益。