Borel C, Hanley D
Neurologic Critical Care Unit, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Crit Care Clin. 1985 Jul;1(2):223-39.
Monitoring modalities unique to the neurologic intensive care unit include intracranial pressure monitors and neuroelectrophysiologic monitors. Each modality fullfills criteria for accuracy, responsivity during clinical change, and stability over time for trend analysis. Intracranial pressure monitoring may be accomplished by any of three approaches--ventricular catheter, subarachnoid bolt, or epidural pressure transducer. Intracranial pressure control has proved beneficial in at least three different illnesses--acute closed head injury, acute noncommunicating hydrocephalus, and Reye's syndrome. Other illnesses, such as cerebral hemorrhage, near drowning, meningitis, encephalitis, and cerebral mass lesions, are often associated with ICP elevations. Neuroelectrophysiologic monitoring encompassing electroencephalography (EEG), signal-processed EEG, and evoked potentials has proved to be most beneficial to the intensive care setting. Evoked potentials are most useful for monitoring patients in drug-induced coma or muscle paralysis in whom a clinical neurologic examination is unreliable. Focal neurologic deficits, incipient brainstem ischemia, and possibly brain death can be deduced from multimodality-evoked potentials (brainstem auditory and somatosensory). Evoked potential apparatus can be used to record sequential stimuli and trend changes. Signal-processed EEG apparatus (compressed spectral array and cerebral function monitor) are used to assess global or regional EEG activity for longer periods of time. Interpretation of signal-processed EEG recording requires some experience with this technique, but it is much easier to interpret than a standard 16-lead EEG. These monitors are useful in evaluating some forms of abnormal EEG activity and in monitoring gross changes in global or regional electrical activity. Currently available technology offers dynamic insight into the management of acute neurologic illnesses. The technology in evoked potential and signal processed EEG monitoring will eventually reduce the size and complexity of the instrumentation, making its application routine. Intracranial pressure monitoring is already routine in many intensive care units, although its use is occasionally sporadic. We believe that application of appropriate neurologic monitors improves therapy and outcome in neurologically injured and ill patients.
神经重症监护病房特有的监测方式包括颅内压监测仪和神经电生理监测仪。每种监测方式都符合准确性、临床变化时的反应性以及随时间稳定性以便进行趋势分析的标准。颅内压监测可通过三种方法中的任何一种来完成——脑室导管、蛛网膜下腔螺栓或硬膜外压力传感器。颅内压控制已被证明在至少三种不同疾病中有益——急性闭合性颅脑损伤、急性非交通性脑积水和瑞氏综合征。其他疾病,如脑出血、近乎溺水、脑膜炎、脑炎和脑占位性病变,常与颅内压升高有关。包括脑电图(EEG)、信号处理脑电图和诱发电位在内的神经电生理监测已被证明对重症监护环境最为有益。诱发电位对于监测药物诱导昏迷或肌肉麻痹的患者最为有用,因为这些患者的临床神经检查不可靠。局灶性神经功能缺损、早期脑干缺血以及可能的脑死亡可从多模态诱发电位(脑干听觉和躯体感觉)中推断出来。诱发电位仪器可用于记录连续刺激和趋势变化。信号处理脑电图仪器(压缩频谱阵列和脑功能监测仪)用于长时间评估全局或局部脑电图活动。信号处理脑电图记录的解读需要一些该技术的经验,但比标准的16导联脑电图更容易解读。这些监测仪有助于评估某些形式的异常脑电图活动以及监测全局或局部电活动的总体变化。目前可用的技术为急性神经系统疾病的管理提供了动态见解。诱发电位和信号处理脑电图监测技术最终将减小仪器的尺寸和复杂性,使其应用成为常规操作。颅内压监测在许多重症监护病房已经是常规操作,尽管其使用偶尔是零星的。我们相信,应用适当的神经监测仪可改善神经损伤和患病患者的治疗及预后。