Waldmeier P C, Baumann P A, Wicki P, Feldtrauer J J, Stierlin C, Schmutz M
Research Department, Pharmaceuticals Division, Ciba-Geigy Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Neurology. 1995 Oct;45(10):1907-13. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.10.1907.
We compared the effects of the antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine on the release from rat brain slices of endogenous glutamate, [3H]-GABA, and [3H]-dopamine, elicited by the Na+ channel opener, veratrine, and of the same transmitters as well as [3H]-noradrenaline, [3H]-5-hydroxytryptamine, and [3H]-acetylcholine, elicited by electrical stimulation. The three antiepileptic drugs inhibited veratrine-induced release of endogenous glutamate, [3H]-GABA, and [3H]-dopamine, with IC50 values between 23 and 150 microM, in or near the concentration range in which they interact with Na+ channels, and there was little difference between the compounds. They were five to seven times less potent in inhibiting electrically as compared with veratrine-stimulated release of [3H]-GABA and [3H]-dopamine; similarly, carbamazepine and tetrodotoxin were more potent in inhibiting veratrine-induced as compared with electrically induced release of endogenous glutamate. Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine also inhibited electrically stimulated release of [3H]-5-hydroxytryptamine (IC50 values, 150 to 250 microM) and [3H]-acetylcholine (IC50 values, 50 to 150 microM); [3H]-noradrenaline release was affected to a lesser degree. The active concentration ranges of these drugs with respect to inhibition of veratrine-stimulated neurotransmitter release matched the therapeutic plasma and brain concentrations. It is uncertain whether these effects are relevant in vivo at anticonvulsant doses, because the drugs are markedly less potent in inhibiting the more physiologic release elicited by electrical stimulation. Therefore, the hypothesis that inhibition of glutamate release is the mechanism of anticonvulsant action of lamotrigine (or carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine) is doubtful. Other consequences of Na+ channel blockade may have an important role.
我们比较了抗癫痫药物卡马西平、奥卡西平和拉莫三嗪对由Na⁺通道开放剂藜芦碱引发的大鼠脑片内源性谷氨酸、[³H]-γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)和[³H]-多巴胺释放的影响,以及对由电刺激引发的相同递质以及[³H]-去甲肾上腺素、[³H]-5-羟色胺和[³H]-乙酰胆碱释放的影响。这三种抗癫痫药物抑制藜芦碱诱导的内源性谷氨酸、[³H]-GABA和[³H]-多巴胺释放,半数抑制浓度(IC50)值在23至150微摩尔之间,处于它们与Na⁺通道相互作用的浓度范围或接近该范围,且这些化合物之间差异不大。与藜芦碱刺激释放[³H]-GABA和[³H]-多巴胺相比,它们抑制电刺激释放的效力低五至七倍;同样,与电诱导释放内源性谷氨酸相比,卡马西平和河豚毒素在抑制藜芦碱诱导释放方面更有效。卡马西平、奥卡西平和拉莫三嗪也抑制电刺激释放的[³H]-5-羟色胺(IC50值为150至250微摩尔)和[³H]-乙酰胆碱(IC50值为50至150微摩尔);[³H]-去甲肾上腺素释放受到的影响较小。这些药物抑制藜芦碱刺激的神经递质释放的活性浓度范围与治疗性血浆和脑浓度相符。尚不确定这些作用在抗惊厥剂量下在体内是否相关,因为这些药物在抑制电刺激引发的更生理性释放方面效力明显较低。因此,拉莫三嗪(或卡马西平和奥卡西平)抗惊厥作用机制是抑制谷氨酸释放这一假说值得怀疑。Na⁺通道阻断的其他后果可能起重要作用。