Suppr超能文献

依那普利治疗进行性慢性肾衰竭对照试验的远期结果。硬终点及蛋白尿的影响。

Late outcome of a controlled trial of enalapril treatment in progressive chronic renal failure. Hard end-points and influence of proteinuria.

作者信息

Kamper A L, Strandgaard S, Leyssac P P

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10(7):1182-8.

PMID:7478121
Abstract

An earlier controlled trial showed that over an average of 26 months, enalapril slowed the progression of chronic renal failure. Following completion of the trial, the patients continued to receive antihypertensive treatment according to ordinary clinical criteria. All but four patients in the enalapril group remained on that drug, and two patients in the control group were switched to an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. In the present study the fate of the 70 patients 44 months after termination of the trial was investigated, with a total follow-up of around 7 years. In the original enalapril group, 12 of the 35 patients (34%) were alive without renal replacement therapy versus five of the 35 patients (14%) in the control group. This difference of 20% in favour of having been in the enalapril group in the original trial was significant (P = 0.05; 95% confidence limits 0.5-39.5%). The influence of baseline proteinuria on clinical outcome was analysed. In the original control group, baseline renal clearances of albumin (Calb) and immunoglobulin G (CIgG) were significantly lower in patients surviving without renal replacement therapy at follow-up than in patients who ultimately developed end-stage renal failure (ESRF) (P < 0.05). In the original enalapril group, these baseline clearances were equal in the two renal outcome groups. In all patients, baseline Calb and CIgG were negatively correlated with the rate of change in GFR during the controlled trial (r = -0.37, P < 0.01 and r = -0.28, P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

一项较早的对照试验表明,在平均26个月的时间里,依那普利减缓了慢性肾衰竭的进展。试验结束后,患者继续根据普通临床标准接受抗高血压治疗。依那普利组除4名患者外,其余患者均继续服用该药物,对照组有2名患者改用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂。在本研究中,对试验结束44个月后70例患者的情况进行了调查,总随访时间约为7年。在最初的依那普利组中,35例患者中有12例(34%)存活且未接受肾脏替代治疗,而对照组35例患者中有5例(14%)存活。在最初的试验中,依那普利组的这一优势为20%,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.05;95%置信区间为0.5 - 39.5%)。分析了基线蛋白尿对临床结局的影响。在最初的对照组中,随访时存活且未接受肾脏替代治疗的患者,其白蛋白(Calb)和免疫球蛋白G(CIgG)的基线肾清除率显著低于最终发展为终末期肾衰竭(ESRF)的患者(P < 0.05)。在最初的依那普利组中,这两个肾脏结局组的这些基线清除率相等。在所有患者中,基线Calb和CIgG与对照试验期间肾小球滤过率(GFR)的变化率呈负相关(r = -0.37,P < 0.01;r = -0.28,P < 0.05)。(摘要截选至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验