• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌胚抗原(CEA)与糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)联合检测在胃癌中的预后价值

Prognostic value of combination assays for CEA and CA 19-9 in gastric cancer.

作者信息

Ikeda Y, Oomori H, Koyanagi N, Mori M, Kamakura T, Minagawa S, Tateishi H, Sugimachi K

机构信息

Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Japan.

出版信息

Oncology. 1995 Nov-Dec;52(6):483-6. doi: 10.1159/000227515.

DOI:10.1159/000227515
PMID:7478435
Abstract

Preoperative serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels in 158 patients with gastric cancer were analyzed with respect to prognostic factors, using univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of high preoperative levels of both CEA and CA 19-9 was 10.1% (16/158). 13.9% (22/158) showed high CEA levels and normal CA 19-9 levels, whereas the reverse was true in 16.5% (26/158). Neither marker showed a high level in 59.5% (94/158). The multivariate analysis showed that in addition to tumor stage, the depth of invasion, liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination, combination assays of preoperative serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels were an independent prognostic factor. Combination assays of preoperative serum CEA and CA 19-9 will allow us to conduct a more careful postoperative follow-up of high-risk patients, and also help determine the optimum adjuvant chemotherapy.

摘要

对158例胃癌患者术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)水平进行分析,以探讨其作为预后因素的价值,采用单因素和多因素分析方法。术前CEA和CA 19-9水平均升高的发生率为10.1%(16/158)。13.9%(22/158)患者CEA水平升高而CA 19-9水平正常,反之,16.5%(26/158)患者CA 19-9水平升高而CEA水平正常。59.5%(94/158)患者两种标志物水平均未升高。多因素分析显示,除肿瘤分期、浸润深度、肝转移和腹膜播散外,术前血清CEA和CA 19-9水平联合检测是独立的预后因素。术前血清CEA和CA 19-9水平联合检测有助于对高危患者进行更密切的术后随访,并有助于确定最佳辅助化疗方案。

相似文献

1
Prognostic value of combination assays for CEA and CA 19-9 in gastric cancer.癌胚抗原(CEA)与糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)联合检测在胃癌中的预后价值
Oncology. 1995 Nov-Dec;52(6):483-6. doi: 10.1159/000227515.
2
Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma.CEA、CA 19-9和CA 72-4术前血清水平在胃癌中的预后意义
Oncology. 1999 Jul;57(1):55-62. doi: 10.1159/000012001.
3
Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serum Levels of Five Tumor Markers (Carcinoembryonic Antigen, CA19-9, Alpha-fetoprotein, CA72-4, and CA125) in Gastric Cancer.术前血清中五种肿瘤标志物(癌胚抗原、CA19-9、甲胎蛋白、CA72-4和CA125)水平在胃癌中的预后价值
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 May;61(131):863-9.
4
Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.癌胚抗原、CA 19-9和CA 72-4在胃癌中的预后价值。
Tumour Biol. 2001 Sep-Oct;22(5):318-22. doi: 10.1159/000050633.
5
Prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.术前血清癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9及糖类抗原72-4水平在胃癌中的预后价值
Anticancer Res. 1997 Jul-Aug;17(4B):2903-6.
6
Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者中CA72-4与CEA和CA19-9相比的临床意义及预后价值
Dis Markers. 2000;16(3-4):105-10. doi: 10.1155/2000/595492.
7
Combined detection of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in the diagnosis and prognosis of resectable gastric cancer.联合检测癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9、糖类抗原242和糖类抗原50在可切除胃癌诊断及预后评估中的应用
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(15):6295-300. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.15.6295.
8
The prognostic significance of preoperative serum CA 19-9 in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma: comparison with CEA.可切除胃癌患者术前血清CA 19-9的预后意义:与癌胚抗原的比较
J Surg Oncol. 2001 Apr;76(4):266-71. doi: 10.1002/jso.1044.
9
Multivariate analysis of the prognostic value of CEA and CA 19-9 serum levels in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)血清水平预后价值的多变量分析
Anticancer Res. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6D):5195-8.
10
Clinical assessment and prognostic evaluation of tumor markers in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者肿瘤标志物的临床评估与预后评价。
Int J Biol Markers. 2013 Jun 28;28(2):192-200. doi: 10.5301/jbm.5000023.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic value of postoperative tumor marker conversion for gastric cancer.胃癌术后肿瘤标志物转化的预后价值
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;16(2):119-126. doi: 10.14216/kjco.20018. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
2
Association of Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Gastric Cancer Recurrence: A Large Cohort Study.术前血清癌胚抗原与胃癌复发的关联:一项大型队列研究
J Cancer. 2021 Jan 1;12(2):397-403. doi: 10.7150/jca.47899. eCollection 2021.
3
Nomogram for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
预测晚期胃癌患者新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的列线图。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 May 21;26(19):2427-2439. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i19.2427.
4
Adhesion molecules in peritoneal dissemination: function, prognostic relevance and therapeutic options.腹膜播散中的黏附分子:功能、预后相关性及治疗选择
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016 Jun;33(5):401-16. doi: 10.1007/s10585-016-9791-0. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
5
Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Value of Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.血清糖类抗原19-9在胃癌中的临床病理及预后价值:一项Meta分析
Dis Markers. 2015;2015:549843. doi: 10.1155/2015/549843. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
6
Prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in gastric cancer.术前血清肿瘤标志物在胃癌中的预后价值
World J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;5(2):170-6. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.170.
7
Preoperative serum tumor marker levels in gastric cancer.胃癌患者术前血清肿瘤标志物水平。
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Jan;30(1):145-9. doi: 10.12669/pjms.301.3968.
8
Clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a single-center experience.胃癌患者的临床病理特征和结局:单中心经验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(14):2154-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2154.
9
Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.血清肿瘤标志物对胃癌的临床意义:日本胃癌协会工作组的文献系统评价。
Gastric Cancer. 2014 Jan;17(1):26-33. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0259-5. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Perspectives of tumour markers in gastrointestinal malignancies - an overview.胃肠道恶性肿瘤中肿瘤标志物的研究现状——综述
Indian J Surg. 2008 Dec;70(6):274-80. doi: 10.1007/s12262-008-0083-z. Epub 2008 Dec 23.