Gries J A, Black D R, Coster D C
People's Health Center, Indianapolis, IN 46201-2097, USA.
Prev Med. 1995 Jul;24(4):348-56. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1057.
This study was a first initiative to evaluate the application of social marketing theory (SMT) to increase attendance at an alcohol abuse education program for university residence hall students and to ascertain whether aggressive recruitment strategies are necessary as part of the stepped approach model (SAM) of service delivery.
SMT and public health strategies that include focus groups, in-depth interviews, and intercept interviews were used to develop recruitment materials in a Test Hall. These new recruitment materials were introduced to the residents in the Treatment Hall (N = 727) and were compared to the Usual Care, Control Hall (N = 706) which received the recruitment materials normally provided to residents as well as to three Historical Halls separately and combined which had used the Usual Care recruitment materials in the past.
The Treatment Hall percentage attendance was significantly superior (0.001 < p < 0.05) in all comparisons. The percentage attendance did not differ significantly from marketing literature expectations. The projections for campus-wide attendance for residence hall students were between 207 and 243 participants and for nationwide attendance, 36,900 +/- 8,185.
The results suggest that the SMT and public health methods used are helpful in developing recruitment strategies and are an important initial step of the SAM and that a "minimal intervention" recruitment strategy is a cost-effective approach that can have a dramatic impact.
本研究首次尝试评估社会营销理论(SMT)在提高大学宿舍学生参加酒精滥用教育项目的出勤率方面的应用,并确定积极的招募策略作为逐步推进服务模式(SAM)的一部分是否必要。
采用社会营销理论和包括焦点小组、深度访谈及拦截访谈在内的公共卫生策略,在一个测试宿舍区制作招募材料。这些新的招募材料被介绍给治疗宿舍区的居民(N = 727),并与接受通常提供给居民的招募材料的常规护理对照宿舍区(N = 706)以及过去使用过常规护理招募材料的三个历史宿舍区(分别及合并)进行比较。
在所有比较中,治疗宿舍区的出勤率百分比显著更高(0.001 < p < 0.05)。出勤率百分比与营销文献预期无显著差异。校园范围内宿舍学生的出勤预测人数在207至243名参与者之间,全国范围内的出勤预测人数为36,900 +/- 8,185。
结果表明,所采用的社会营销理论和公共卫生方法有助于制定招募策略,是逐步推进服务模式的重要初始步骤,且“最小干预”招募策略是一种具有成本效益的方法,可产生显著影响。