Hu H H, Wang S, Chern C M, Yeh H H, Sheng W Y, Lo Y K
Division of Cerebrovascular Disease, Neurological Institute Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taiwan, ROC.
Acta Neurol Scand. 1995 Sep;92(3):242-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1995.tb01695.x.
A total of 141 subjects with tight stenosis (> or = 75%) or occlusion of internal carotid artery were followed up at intervals 3-6 months regularly for 40 +/- 16 months. The direction of ophthalmic artery flow was used as a parameter of risk indicator on cerebral ischemic events. Eleven patients with bilateral carotid tight stenosis/occlusion were excluded in the analysis. Thus, the 130 carotid arteries were divided into three groups: (1) carotid artery with ipsilateral hemispheric TIA or stroke (85 patients), (2) carotid arteries with contralateral hemispheric TIA/stroke or VBI (15 patients), and (3) carotid arteries of asymptomatic patients (30 patients). The symptomatic carotid artery group (group 1) had significantly more often reversed ophthalmic flow than the other two groups (group 2 and 3, p < 0.001). During follow-up prospectively for four years, 41 patients had cerebral ischemic events, three had cardiac ischemic events and six died of malignancy. Patients with reversed OA flow had more often subsequent cerebral ischemic events than those with forward flow (27 vs 14, p = 0.010). However, the difference remained significant only in the asymptomatic patients (group 3, 4 vs 0, P < 0.001), not for groups 1 and 2, after further analysis. Our work supported that the clinical role of ophthalmic artery collateral varied between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.
共有141例颈内动脉严重狭窄(≥75%)或闭塞患者,每隔3 - 6个月定期随访,随访时间为40±16个月。眼动脉血流方向被用作脑缺血事件风险指标的参数。分析时排除了11例双侧颈动脉严重狭窄/闭塞患者。因此,130条颈动脉被分为三组:(1)同侧半球短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或中风的颈动脉(85例患者),(2)对侧半球TIA/中风或椎基底动脉供血不足(VBI)的颈动脉(15例患者),以及(3)无症状患者的颈动脉(30例患者)。有症状的颈动脉组(第1组)眼血流反向的情况明显比其他两组(第2组和第3组)更常见(p<0.001)。在为期四年的前瞻性随访期间,41例患者发生脑缺血事件,3例发生心脏缺血事件,6例死于恶性肿瘤。眼动脉血流反向的患者比血流正向的患者更常发生随后的脑缺血事件(27例对14例,p = 0.010)。然而,进一步分析后发现,这种差异仅在无症状患者中仍然显著(第3组,4例对0例,P<0.001),在第1组和第2组中不显著。我们的研究支持眼动脉侧支循环在无症状和有症状患者中的临床作用有所不同。