• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受茴酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物治疗的患者与未接受溶栓治疗的患者急性心肌梗死死亡率的比较。

Comparison of mortality from acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving anistreplase with those not receiving thrombolysis.

作者信息

Ozbek C, Heisel A, Krause M, Berg G, Hammer B, Bay W, Sen S, Schieffer H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1995 Dec 1;76(16):1103-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80314-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80314-2
PMID:7484891
Abstract

Within 1 year, 434 patients were admitted to 14 hospitals with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) < or = 4 hours after the onset of symptoms. Group A consisted of 171 patients (39%) treated with thrombolysis, and group B consisted of 263 patients (61%) with contraindications. Patients in group A more likely had a "definite AMI" (92%; group A1) than patients in group B (67%; group B1). Group B1 had 277 contraindications (1.6/per patient) with increased risk for life-threatening bleeding being the most frequently recorded at admission. The in-hospital mortality in group A1 was 7% (11 of 158) and in group B1, 27% (47 of 177) (p < 0.0001). Age and type of therapy (thrombolysis or no thrombolysis) were identified as independent predictors of increased mortality (p < 0.0001 and < 0.05, respectively). Thus, although most patients with an AMI are excluded from thrombolytic therapy because of contraindications, our data suggest that their in-hospital mortality is unexpectedly high. Further evaluation of this group of patients is warranted to define the impact of contraindications as an independent factor of mortality.

摘要

在1年时间里,有434例症状发作后≤4小时疑似急性心肌梗死(AMI)的患者被收治于14家医院。A组由171例(39%)接受溶栓治疗的患者组成,B组由263例(61%)有禁忌证的患者组成。A组患者比B组患者更有可能患有“确诊AMI”(92%;A1组)(67%;B1组)。B1组有277项禁忌证(人均1.6项),入院时记录最多的是危及生命出血风险增加。A1组的院内死亡率为7%(158例中的11例),B1组为27%(177例中的47例)(p<0.0001)。年龄和治疗类型(溶栓或未溶栓)被确定为死亡率增加的独立预测因素(分别为p<0.0001和<0.05)。因此,尽管大多数AMI患者因禁忌证被排除在溶栓治疗之外,但我们的数据表明他们的院内死亡率意外地高。有必要对这组患者进行进一步评估,以确定禁忌证作为死亡率独立因素的影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of mortality from acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving anistreplase with those not receiving thrombolysis.接受茴酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物治疗的患者与未接受溶栓治疗的患者急性心肌梗死死亡率的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Dec 1;76(16):1103-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80314-2.
2
Magnitude of benefit from earlier thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: new evidence from Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT).急性心肌梗死早期溶栓治疗的获益程度:格兰扁地区早期茴酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物试验(GREAT)的新证据。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 27;312(7025):212-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7025.212.
3
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.全科医生进行家庭溶栓治疗的可行性、安全性及有效性:格兰扁地区早期茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物试验。GREAT研究小组
BMJ. 1992 Sep 5;305(6853):548-53. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6853.548.
4
[Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarct--is it being used to the fullest?].[急性心肌梗死中的溶栓治疗——是否得到了充分应用?]
Rev Port Cardiol. 1996 Dec;15(12):867-76, 863.
5
Efficacy of rescue thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction: preliminary findings.急性心肌梗死患者挽救性溶栓治疗的疗效:初步研究结果。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2000 Feb;14(1):83-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007803523966.
6
Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: five-year results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT).早期溶栓治疗获益的量化评估:格兰扁地区早期茴酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物试验(GREAT)的五年结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Nov 1;30(5):1181-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00299-4.
7
GREAT: 10 year survival of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in a randomised comparison of prehospital and hospital thrombolysis.GREAT研究:院前溶栓与院内溶栓随机对照研究中疑似急性心肌梗死患者的10年生存率
Heart. 2003 May;89(5):563-4. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.5.563.
8
Selection factors for the use of thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: a population based study of current practice in the United Kingdom. The European Secondary Prevention Study Group.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗的选择因素:基于英国当前实践的人群研究。欧洲二级预防研究小组。
Br Heart J. 1995 Sep;74(3):224-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.3.224.
9
Assessment of the practicality and safety of thrombolysis with anistreplase given by general practitioners.全科医生给予茴酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物进行溶栓治疗的实用性及安全性评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Apr;45(393):175-9.
10
Halving of mortality at 1 year by domiciliary thrombolysis in the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT).在格兰扁地区早期茴香酰化纤溶酶原激活剂试验(GREAT)中,家庭溶栓治疗使1年死亡率减半。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jan;23(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90494-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac rehabilitation: socially deprived patients are less likely to attend but patients ineligible for thrombolysis are less likely to be invited.心脏康复:社会经济地位低下的患者参加的可能性较小,但不符合溶栓条件的患者被邀请的可能性较小。
Heart. 1999 Sep;82(3):373-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.3.373.
2
Relevance of clinical trial results in myocardial infarction to medical practice: comparison of four year outcome in participants of a thrombolytic trial, patients receiving routine thrombolysis, and those deemed ineligible for thrombolysis.心肌梗死临床试验结果与医疗实践的相关性:溶栓试验参与者、接受常规溶栓治疗的患者以及被认为不适合溶栓治疗的患者的四年结局比较。
Heart. 1999 Jun;81(6):598-602. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.6.598.