Edwards W H
Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Thomas Hospital, Nashville, TN 37202, USA.
Am Surg. 1995 Dec;61(12):1057-60.
The advantages of internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts over saphenous vein grafts (SVG) for coronary artery bypass grafting have been extensively recorded in the literature. Operative results and postoperative mortality in patients with IMA versus SVG are comparable. The relative risks of thrombosis, however, of an SVG are four to five times greater than an IMA graft, and the probability of recurrent angina or need for reoperation is significantly less in IMA grafted patients. Coltharp et al. also showed that the risks of reoperation for recurrent angina were decreased by a previously constructed IMA graft.
在冠状动脉旁路移植术中,乳内动脉(IMA)移植物相较于大隐静脉移植物(SVG)的优势在文献中已有广泛记载。接受IMA移植与SVG移植患者的手术结果及术后死亡率相当。然而,SVG发生血栓形成的相对风险比IMA移植物大4至5倍,且接受IMA移植的患者发生复发性心绞痛或需要再次手术的可能性显著更低。科尔萨普等人还表明,先前构建的IMA移植物可降低因复发性心绞痛而再次手术的风险。