van Geelen A G, Slobbe-van Drunen M E, Muller A D, Bruggeman C A, Van Dam-Mieras M C
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arch Virol. 1995;140(9):1601-12. doi: 10.1007/BF01322533.
Previously, we have reported on the increase in procoagulant activity of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) after infection with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). When using microvascular endothelial cells from foreskin (MVEC), we also observe a significant increase in membrane perturbation and a concomittant increase in procoagulant activity. This effect is both observed with a laboratory HCMV strain (AD169) with low pathogenicity for endothelium and a HUVEC adapted strain (VHL-E) that readily infects endothelial cells. We compared the membrane perturbation of two types of endothelial cells, HUVEC and MVEC with human embryonal fibroblasts (HEF), being fully permissive for both strains. A membrane effect was only found in endothelial cells. Our results suggest that HCMV induces in MVEC more merocyanine-540 incorporation in the membrane as in HUVEC. The increase in the procoagulant activity induced by HCMV was more pronounced in MVEC than in HUVEC. Inactivated virus, as well as virus pre-incubated with heparin was unable to evoke membrane perturbation. It therefore appears that HCMV induces a rapid membrane response in vascular endothelium and that physical interaction of the virion and the endothelial cell is required to elicit this response.
此前,我们曾报道过人巨细胞病毒(HCMV)感染后人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVEC)促凝活性增加。当使用包皮微血管内皮细胞(MVEC)时,我们也观察到膜扰动显著增加,同时促凝活性也随之增加。在对内皮细胞致病性较低的实验室HCMV毒株(AD169)和易于感染内皮细胞的HUVEC适应毒株(VHL-E)中均观察到了这种效应。我们将两种类型的内皮细胞HUVEC和MVEC的膜扰动与对两种毒株均完全易感的人胚成纤维细胞(HEF)进行了比较。仅在内皮细胞中发现了膜效应。我们的结果表明,HCMV在MVEC中诱导的膜中花青素-540掺入比在HUVEC中更多。HCMV诱导的促凝活性增加在MVEC中比在HUVEC中更明显。灭活病毒以及与肝素预孵育的病毒均无法引起膜扰动。因此,似乎HCMV在血管内皮中诱导了快速的膜反应,并且病毒体与内皮细胞的物理相互作用是引发这种反应所必需的。