Futterman L G
Division of Cardiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Medical Center, Fla, USA.
Am J Crit Care. 1995 Sep;4(5):383-8.
Extraordinary advances in science and medicine such as transplantation of human tissues not only bring about previously unimaginable societal benefits but also create profound implications that involve autonomy and belonging, opposing moral considerations, and legal concerns. Today, technology is changing faster than our values. The issue of salvaging organs from the dead to meet the escalating need for human organs for lifesaving organ transplantation has evolved into an intricate web of interdisciplinary concerns and value conflicts; right and wrong are opinions and consensus does not seem to exist. This organ supply-demand mismatch, as well as suggestions for its resolution, has become a major challenge to the transplant community and to those in political and bioethical arenas. A methodical transition to presumed consent, or opting-out legislation, which removes the burden of decision from the family and the burden of request from the healthcare professional, may be the only solution to correct the imbalance between human organ need and availability.
科学和医学领域的非凡进展,如人体组织移植,不仅带来了以前难以想象的社会效益,也产生了涉及自主权与归属感、相互对立的道德考量以及法律问题的深远影响。如今,技术的变革速度超过了我们的价值观。为满足器官移植日益增长的人体器官需求而从死者身上摘取器官的问题,已演变成一个错综复杂的跨学科问题和价值冲突网络;对错只是观点,似乎不存在共识。这种器官供需不匹配以及解决这一问题的建议,已成为移植界以及政治和生物伦理领域人士面临的重大挑战。有条不紊地过渡到推定同意或选择退出立法,即消除家属的决策负担和医护人员的请求负担,可能是纠正人体器官需求与可获得性之间失衡的唯一解决方案。