Suppr超能文献

谷峰比值作为评估抗高血压药物的一种手段。动态血压与高血压治疗试验研究人员。

The trough-to-peak ratio as an instrument to evaluate antihypertensive drugs. The APTH Investigators. Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension Trial.

作者信息

Staessen J A, Bieniaszewski L, Buntinx F, Celis H, O'Brien E T, van Hoof R, Fagard R

机构信息

Klinisch Laboratorium Hypertensie, Inwendige Geneeskunde-Cardiologie, Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1995 Dec;26(6 Pt 1):942-9. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.6.942.

Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration designed the trough-to-peak ratio as an instrument for the evaluation of long-acting antihypertensive drugs, but the ratios are usually reported without accounting for interindividual variability. This study investigated how the trough-to-peak ratio would be affected by interindividual and intraindividual variability and by smoothing of the diurnal blood pressure profiles. The ambulatory blood pressure was recorded on placebo in 143 hypertensive patients (diastolic pressure on conventional measurement > 95 mm Hg). After 2 months, the recordings were repeated on 10 mg (n = 66) or 20 mg (n = 77) lisinopril given once daily between 7 and 11 PM. The baseline-adjusted trough-to-peak ratios were determined from diurnal blood pressure profiles with 1-hour precision. Lisinopril reduced (+/- SD) the 24-hour pressure by 16 +/- 17 mm Hg for systolic and 10 +/- 10 mm Hg for diastolic (P < .001). According to the usual approach, disregarding interindividual variability, the trough-to-peak ratio was 0.72 for systolic pressure and 0.67 for diastolic pressure. In the 143 patients the ratios were not normally distributed. They were the same on both lisinopril doses. When interindividual variability was accounted for, the median trough-to-peak ratio was 0.34 (P5 to P95 interval, -0.46 to 0.87) for systolic pressure and 0.26 (-0.44 to 0.84) for diastolic pressure. In 66 patients examined twice on 10 mg lisinopril at a median interval of 32 days, the trough-to-peak ratios were characterized by large intraindividual variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局将谷峰比设计为评估长效抗高血压药物的一种工具,但通常在报告这些比值时未考虑个体间变异性。本研究调查了个体间和个体内变异性以及昼夜血压曲线平滑处理对谷峰比的影响。对143例高血压患者(常规测量舒张压>95 mmHg)进行了安慰剂状态下的动态血压记录。2个月后,在晚上7点至11点之间每天一次给予10 mg(n = 66)或20 mg(n = 77)赖诺普利后重复记录。根据精确到1小时的昼夜血压曲线确定基线调整后的谷峰比。赖诺普利使收缩压24小时血压降低(±标准差)16±17 mmHg,舒张压降低10±10 mmHg(P<.001)。按照通常的方法,不考虑个体间变异性,收缩压的谷峰比为0.72,舒张压的谷峰比为0.67。在143例患者中,这些比值呈非正态分布。两种赖诺普利剂量下的比值相同。当考虑个体间变异性时,收缩压的谷峰比中位数为0.34(P5至P95区间,-0.46至0.87),舒张压的谷峰比中位数为0.26(-0.44至0.84)。在66例患者中,以32天的中位数间隔对10 mg赖诺普利进行了两次检查,谷峰比表现出较大的个体内变异性。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验