Kimelberg H K
Division of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, New York, USA.
J Neurosurg. 1995 Dec;83(6):1051-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.6.1051.
Klatzo's classification of brain edema into two types, vasogenic and cytotoxic, has been in general use since 1967. The former involves overall brain swelling due to fluid entry from the vasculature because of openings in the blood-brain barrier (BBB), whereas the latter refers to cell swelling without any loss of the normal impermeability of the BBB. This review principally covers new work that identifies the intracellular swelling of astrocytes as a major form of cytotoxic edema seen in many different kinds of brain injury. The term edema should be retained because of its familiarity; however, because such intracellular swelling is usually not a response to toxins, it is suggested that the term cellular edema is preferable to cytotoxic edema. The difficulties involved in measuring cellular edema clinically are discussed, and the belief that a "pure" form of either edema is unlikely to exist. It is emphasized that the mechanisms and direct consequences of vasogenic and cellular edema are so different that the connection is mainly semantic. Studies conducted in vitro have identified several potentially damaging secondary consequences of astrocytic swelling. One of the most important of these seems likely to be the increased release of excitatory amino acids from swollen astrocytes. Potential mechanisms for inhibition of the increased release of amino acids have been identified in vitro and could prove therapeutically useful.
自1967年以来,克拉佐将脑水肿分为血管源性和细胞毒性两种类型的分类方法一直在广泛使用。前者是由于血脑屏障(BBB)出现缺口,液体从血管系统进入导致全脑肿胀,而后者是指细胞肿胀,BBB的正常屏障功能并未丧失。本综述主要涵盖了一些新的研究成果,这些研究确定了星形胶质细胞的细胞内肿胀是多种脑损伤中细胞毒性水肿的主要形式。由于“水肿”一词广为人知,所以应予以保留;然而,由于这种细胞内肿胀通常并非对毒素的反应,因此建议使用“细胞性水肿”一词比“细胞毒性水肿”更合适。文中讨论了临床上测量细胞性水肿所涉及的困难,以及认为不太可能存在“纯粹”形式的任何一种水肿的观点。强调血管源性水肿和细胞性水肿的机制及直接后果差异极大,两者之间的联系主要是语义上的。体外研究已经确定了星形胶质细胞肿胀的几种潜在有害的继发性后果。其中最重要的一个后果似乎可能是肿胀的星形胶质细胞释放兴奋性氨基酸增加。体外已经确定了抑制氨基酸释放增加的潜在机制,这些机制可能具有治疗价值。