Suppr超能文献

Comparative analysis of three PMS assessment instruments--the identification of premenstrual syndrome with core symptoms.

作者信息

Thys-Jacobs S, Alvir J M, Fratarcangelo P

机构信息

Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacol Bull. 1995;31(2):389-96.

PMID:7491397
Abstract

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a commonly encountered complaint among women. This study compared the PMS Diary (PMSD), which measures core menstrual symptoms (negative affect, water retention, and pain symptoms), with two commonly used self-rating forms, the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) and the Daily Rating Form (DRF). Thirty-seven premenopausal women with documented PMS completed the forms. A multitrait-multimethod analysis was performed to determine overall agreement and reliability. The three instruments and their component scale scores had strong internal consistency. Correlations between overall scores and between scales measuring similar constructs were strong. Correlations were 0.77 between PMSD and MDQ; 0.67 between PMSD and DRF; and 0.81 between MDQ and DRF. The PMSD performs as effectively as more extensive questionnaires in measuring symptoms in women with PMS. The PMS Diary is a concise yet reliable and valid instrument that can be easily administered in ambulatory care and longitudinal research.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验