• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本鹿儿岛德之岛本地山羊的瘤胃纤毛虫

Rumen ciliates of Tokara native goat in Kagoshima, Japan.

作者信息

Ito A, Imai S, Manda M, Ogimoto K

机构信息

Veterinary Clinic Center, Yoron-cho Public Office, Kagoshima, Japan.

出版信息

J Vet Med Sci. 1995 Apr;57(2):355-7. doi: 10.1292/jvms.57.355.

DOI:10.1292/jvms.57.355
PMID:7492663
Abstract

The composition of rumen ciliate protozoa was surveyed in 15 Tokara native goats, Capra hircus domesticus, inhibiting Kagoshima, Japan. As a result, of 11 species with 3 forms under 5 genera detected, Entodinium simplex, E. nanellum and E. rectangulatum were found in all the animals examined. The large ophryoscolecid ciliates detected were Polyplastron multivesiculatum and Metadinium affine alone, which have been regarded as the typical members of Type A composition proposed by Eadie. Since Tokara native goats have been bred isolated in a small islet for a long time, native goats that had been kept in south Japan might possess Type A fauna. Average ciliate density was 43.9 x 10(4) per 1 ml of rumen fluid. The number of species per host was 8.3 on average. Diversity index was 1.412 on average.

摘要

对生活在日本鹿儿岛的15只德之岛本地山羊(Capra hircus domesticus)瘤胃纤毛虫的组成进行了调查。结果,在所检测到的5个属的11种3个形态中,单纯内毛虫、微小内毛虫和矩形内毛虫在所有被检查的动物中均有发现。检测到的大型奥氏多核纤毛虫仅为多泡多膜袋虫和近缘变毛虫,它们被认为是伊迪提出的A型组成的典型成员。由于德之岛本地山羊长期在一个小岛上隔离饲养,生活在日本南部的本地山羊可能拥有A型动物区系。纤毛虫的平均密度为每1毫升瘤胃液43.9×10⁴个。每只宿主的物种数平均为8.3种。多样性指数平均为1.412。

相似文献

1
Rumen ciliates of Tokara native goat in Kagoshima, Japan.日本鹿儿岛德之岛本地山羊的瘤胃纤毛虫
J Vet Med Sci. 1995 Apr;57(2):355-7. doi: 10.1292/jvms.57.355.
2
Rumen ciliate faunae of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and goat (Capra hircus) in Nepal.尼泊尔水牛(Bubalus bubalis)和山羊(Capra hircus)的瘤胃纤毛虫区系
J Vet Med Sci. 2002 Mar;64(3):265-7. doi: 10.1292/jvms.64.265.
3
Rumen ciliate protozoa of domestic sheep (Ovis aries) and goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) in Kyrgyzstan.吉尔吉斯斯坦家养绵羊(Ovis aries)和山羊(Capra aegagrus hircus)的瘤胃纤毛虫原生动物
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016 Mar;363(6). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw028. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Rumen ciliates of Ezo deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) with the morphological comparison with those of cattle.北海道鹿(Cervus nippon yesoensis)瘤胃纤毛虫及其与牛瘤胃纤毛虫的形态学比较
J Vet Med Sci. 1993 Feb;55(1):93-8. doi: 10.1292/jvms.55.93.
5
Ciliate protozoa in the rumen of sassaby antelope, Damaliscus lunatus lunatus, including the description of a new species and form.转角牛羚(Damaliscus lunatus lunatus)瘤胃中的纤毛虫原生动物,包括一个新物种和形态的描述。
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1997 Nov-Dec;44(6):586-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1997.tb05964.x.
6
Rumen ciliate composition and diversity of Japanese beef black cattle in comparison with those of Holstein-Friesian cattle.与荷斯坦-弗里生牛相比,日本黑毛和牛瘤胃纤毛虫的组成与多样性。
J Vet Med Sci. 1994 Aug;56(4):707-14. doi: 10.1292/jvms.56.707.
7
Comparative Study of Rumen Ciliate Fauna of Goat and Sheep in Libya.利比亚山羊和绵羊瘤胃纤毛虫区系的比较研究。
Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2021 Dec 2;45(4):274-279. doi: 10.4274/tpd.galenos.2021.39974.
8
Rumen ciliates from the Mongolian gazelle, Procapra gutturosa.来自黄羊(普氏原羚)的瘤胃纤毛虫。
Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1990 Oct;52(5):1063-7. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.52.1063.
9
Comparative study of rumen ciliates in buffalo, cattle and sheep in Egypt.埃及水牛、黄牛和绵羊瘤胃纤毛虫的比较研究。
J Vet Med Sci. 1996 Aug;58(8):799-801. doi: 10.1292/jvms.58.799.
10
Phylogeny of the rumen ciliates Entodinium, Epidinium and Polyplastron (Litostomatea:Entodiniomorphida) inferred from small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences.基于小亚基核糖体RNA序列推断瘤胃纤毛虫内毛虫属、艾美球虫属和多套膜属(毛口目:内毛亚目)的系统发育
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1997 Jan-Feb;44(1):61-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1997.tb05693.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Rumen Ciliated Protozoa of the Free-Living European Bison (, Linnaeus).自由生活的欧洲野牛(林奈)的瘤胃纤毛虫
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 28;12:658448. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.658448. eCollection 2021.